MedPath

Less Discomfort and Less Pharmacology. Cataract Surgery at Physiologic Intraocular Pressure (IOP)

Completed
Conditions
Nuclear Cataract
Registration Number
NCT06325397
Lead Sponsor
Matthew Rauen
Brief Summary

To investigate the impact of high vs low Intraocular Pressure (IOP) on the intraoperative experience for the patient and surgeon. Operating at a more physiologic IOP using Active Sentry hand piece during cataract surgery will result in significantly less discomfort/pain as assessed by the decreased need for rescue medication

Detailed Description

Objectives:

To investigate the impact of Intraocular Pressure (IOP) high vs low on the intraoperative experience for the patient and surgeon

Design:

Prospective, single-surgeon, subject's first eyes undergoing phacoemulsification will be randomized to high (Intraocular Pressure (IOP) 65 millimeters of mercury (mmHg)) or low (IOP 25mmHg) IOP, contralateral eye will receive other treatment

Hypothesis:

Operating at a more physiologic IOP using Active Sentry hand piece during cataract surgery will result in significantly less discomfort/pain as assessed by the decreased need for rescue medication

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
65
Inclusion Criteria
  • Visually significant cataract 2-3+ undergoing uncomplicated cataract surgery
  • Unremarkable ocular health but inclusive of early Age related macular degeneration (AMD).
Exclusion Criteria
  • History of ocular surgery including corneal refractive surgery
  • Compromised zonular integrity or stability
  • Uncontrolled diabetes and diabetic retinopathy
  • Small pupils
  • History of systemic inflammatory disease/uveitis
  • History of psychiatric illness, chronic pain/narcotics, benzodiazepine usage
  • Abnormal liver or renal function

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Medication RescueIntraoperative

Percentage (%) of pts in each group requiring treatment for breakthrough discomfort/pain

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Surgeon Experience: Assessment on patient cooperationIntraoperative

Surgeon assessment on patient cooperation: poor, good, excellent

1. Poor cooperation: could not follow instructions, lid squeezing, patient had frequent eye \& head movements

2. Good cooperation: able to follow directions 50% of the time, some lid squeezing and patient movement

3. Excellent cooperation: able to follow directions \>80% of the time with limited lid squeezing and patient movement

Cost- analysisIntraoperative

Cost-analysis on intraoperative pharmacological agents utilized between high vs low Intraocular Pressure (IOP)

Physiologic Responses associated with pain/inflammation:Intraoperative

Pulse rate- measured in beats per minute (bpm)

Surgeon Experience: Surgeon intraoperative experienceIntraoperative

Surgeon assessment on overall experience: poor, good, excellent

1. Poor: fluctuating chamber (reverse pupillary block or surge) and reduced efficiency (nucleus \& cortex removal)

2. Good: \>75% chamber stability and adequate efficiency

3. Excellent: Minimal to no fluctuating chamber and excellent efficiency

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Wolfe Eye Clinic

🇺🇸

West Des Moines, Iowa, United States

Wolfe Eye Clinic
🇺🇸West Des Moines, Iowa, United States

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.