Less Discomfort and Less Pharmacology. Cataract Surgery at Physiologic Intraocular Pressure (IOP)
- Conditions
- Nuclear Cataract
- Registration Number
- NCT06325397
- Lead Sponsor
- Matthew Rauen
- Brief Summary
To investigate the impact of high vs low Intraocular Pressure (IOP) on the intraoperative experience for the patient and surgeon. Operating at a more physiologic IOP using Active Sentry hand piece during cataract surgery will result in significantly less discomfort/pain as assessed by the decreased need for rescue medication
- Detailed Description
Objectives:
To investigate the impact of Intraocular Pressure (IOP) high vs low on the intraoperative experience for the patient and surgeon
Design:
Prospective, single-surgeon, subject's first eyes undergoing phacoemulsification will be randomized to high (Intraocular Pressure (IOP) 65 millimeters of mercury (mmHg)) or low (IOP 25mmHg) IOP, contralateral eye will receive other treatment
Hypothesis:
Operating at a more physiologic IOP using Active Sentry hand piece during cataract surgery will result in significantly less discomfort/pain as assessed by the decreased need for rescue medication
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 65
- Visually significant cataract 2-3+ undergoing uncomplicated cataract surgery
- Unremarkable ocular health but inclusive of early Age related macular degeneration (AMD).
- History of ocular surgery including corneal refractive surgery
- Compromised zonular integrity or stability
- Uncontrolled diabetes and diabetic retinopathy
- Small pupils
- History of systemic inflammatory disease/uveitis
- History of psychiatric illness, chronic pain/narcotics, benzodiazepine usage
- Abnormal liver or renal function
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Medication Rescue Intraoperative Percentage (%) of pts in each group requiring treatment for breakthrough discomfort/pain
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Surgeon Experience: Assessment on patient cooperation Intraoperative Surgeon assessment on patient cooperation: poor, good, excellent
1. Poor cooperation: could not follow instructions, lid squeezing, patient had frequent eye \& head movements
2. Good cooperation: able to follow directions 50% of the time, some lid squeezing and patient movement
3. Excellent cooperation: able to follow directions \>80% of the time with limited lid squeezing and patient movementCost- analysis Intraoperative Cost-analysis on intraoperative pharmacological agents utilized between high vs low Intraocular Pressure (IOP)
Physiologic Responses associated with pain/inflammation: Intraoperative Pulse rate- measured in beats per minute (bpm)
Surgeon Experience: Surgeon intraoperative experience Intraoperative Surgeon assessment on overall experience: poor, good, excellent
1. Poor: fluctuating chamber (reverse pupillary block or surge) and reduced efficiency (nucleus \& cortex removal)
2. Good: \>75% chamber stability and adequate efficiency
3. Excellent: Minimal to no fluctuating chamber and excellent efficiency
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Wolfe Eye Clinic
🇺🇸West Des Moines, Iowa, United States
Wolfe Eye Clinic🇺🇸West Des Moines, Iowa, United States