The Effectiveness of Clavipectoral Fascia Plane Block for Analgesia After Clavicle Surgery: Randomized, Prospective Study
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 撤回
- 发起方
- 试验地点
- 2
- 主要终点
- Opioid consumption
研究概览
简要总结
The pain after clavicle fracture surgery may be managed with combined superficial cervical plexus-interscalene block and recently clavipectoral fascia plane block (CPB). CPB was defined by Valdes in 2017 firstly. It may be used for postoperative analgesia after clavicle surgery. CPB may be an alternative to interscalene brachial plexus block.
The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of the US-guided CPB for postoperative analgesia management compare to no intervention control group after clavicle surgery. The primary aim is to compare postoperative opioid consumption and the secondary aim is to evaluate postoperative pain scores (VAS), adverse effects related with opioids (allergic reaction, nausea, vomiting).
详细描述
Clavicle fracture is common in men and children after a direct fall on shoulder during sport activity such as cycling or an injury during a traffic accident. The pain after clavicle fracture surgery may be managed with combined superficial cervical plexus-interscalene block and recently clavipectoral fascia plane block (CPB). CPB was defined by Valdes in 2017 firstly. It may be used for postoperative analgesia after clavicle surgery. The clavipectoral fascia covers the clavicular site of the pectoralis major muscle. It provides the potential interfascial space between the clavicle and the pectoralis major muscle. CPB provide effective analgesia after clavicle surgery. It is also easy to perform. With this advantage and its analgesic effectiveness for clavicle surgery, CPB may be an alternative to interscalene brachial plexus block. However, randomized clinical efficacy trials are needed to investigate the effectiveness of CPB for clavicle fractures. In the literature, data about CPB is so limited, however it seems a good alternative to brachial plexus block for pain management after clavicle fracture The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of the US-guided CPB for postoperative analgesia management compare to no intervention control group after clavicle surgery. The primary aim is to compare postoperative opioid consumption and the secondary aim is to evaluate postoperative pain scores (VAS), adverse effects related with opioids (allergic reaction, nausea, vomiting).
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)
盲法说明
The patient and the anesthesiologist who performs postoperative pain evaluation will not know the group.
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 65 Years（Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification I-II
- •Scheduled for clavicle surgery under general anesthesia
排除标准
- •history of bleeding diathesis,
- •receiving anticoagulant treatment,
- •known local anesthetics and opioid allergy,
- •infection of the skin at the site of the needle puncture,
- •pregnancy or lactation,
- •patients who do not accept the procedure
结局指标
主要结局
Opioid consumption
时间窗: Change from baseline opioid consumption at postoperative 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 24 and 48 hours
The primary aim is to compare postoperative opioid consumption
次要结局
- Pain scores (Visual analogue scores-VAS)(Changes from baseline pain scores at postoperative 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, and 24 hours.)
研究者
Bahadir Ciftci
Primary researcher
Medipol University