Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT00787683
NCT00787683UnknownNot Applicable

Home-Monitoring in ICD Patients

F. Mueller-Riemenschneider13 sites in 1 country416 target enrollmentStarted: October 1, 2008Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Sponsor
Enrollment
416
Locations
13
Primary Endpoint
Comparison of disease specific costs from a societal perspective.

Study Overview

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to investigate the cost-effectiveness and effectiveness of remote-monitoring compared to standard care in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillator.

Detailed Description

Implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) are an important and effective treatment in patients at risk of sudden cardiac death. In order to allow for a more continuous follow-up and reduced complication rates of patients with ICD, new devices including remote-monitoring (home-monitoring) features of patients with ICD have been developed. BIOTRONIK Home Monitoring service enables the doctors to safely follow up their patients with implanted cardioverter-defibrillators in a remote fashion, with fewer in-clinic consultations. This may result in a more efficient follow-up and cost-savings for the health care payer.

The objective of the current study is to investigate the cost-effectiveness and effectiveness of home-monitoring compared to standard care.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to 80 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • •The patient is willing/able to undergo the study protocol appointments and procedures/questionnaires
  • •Indication for implantation of single chamber ICD or dual chamber ICD according to European guidelines

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Age < 18 and > 80 years
  • •Expected non-compliance
  • •Known drug or alcohol abuse
  • •Life expectancy < 1 year
  • •NYHA classification IV
  • •Participation in another clinical study
  • •Participation in another telemonitoring concept
  • •Pregnant or breast-feeding woman
  • •Uncontrolled hypertension
  • •No mobile phone use possible in patient residence

Arms & Interventions

Home-monitoring

Experimental

Patients receive an additional home-monitoring (remote-monitoring) device (CardioMessengerII) following Biotronik Lumax ICD implantation. The device enables regular transmission and examination of ICD information via home-monitoring. Follow-up appointments in outpatient clinic are changed compared to standard care. While follow-up 1, 12, and 24 months after ICD implantation consist of outpatient clinic appointments, follow-up 3, 6, and 18 months after ICD implantation are conducted remotely.

Intervention: Home-monitoring provided by LUMAX ICD device and CardioMessenger II (Device)

Standard care

No Intervention

Patients randomised to the standard care group receive no home-monitoring device (CardioMessengerII) following Lumax ICD implantation. Patients have scheduled follow-up appointments at the ICD outpatient clinics at 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after ICD implantation.

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Comparison of disease specific costs from a societal perspective.

Time Frame: up to 24 months

Secondary Outcomes

  • Number of shocks(up to 24 months)
  • Hospital admissions(up to 24 months)
  • Cardiac events(up to 24 months)
  • Quality of life(up to 24 months)
  • Disease specific Costs from third party payers perspective(up 24 months)
  • Overall costs from societal and third party payers perspective(up to 24 months)

Investigators

Sponsor
F. Mueller-Riemenschneider
Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor Investigator
Principal Investigator

F. Mueller-Riemenschneider

PD, Dr.

Charite University, Berlin, Germany

Study Sites (13)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials