Evaluation of the Office on Violence Against Women's Domestic Violence Homicide Prevention Demonstrative Initiative

Completed

• Conditions: Domestic Violence
• Interventions: Other: Domestic Violence High Risk Team; Other: Lethality Assessment Program

• Registration Number: NCT02021838
• Lead Sponsor: Yale University

Brief Summary

In collaboration with the National Institute of Justice (NIJ) and the Office for Violence Against Women (OVW) the Yale University team will evaluate the implementation process and impact of the U.S. Department of Justice's Domestic Violence Homicide Prevention Demonstration Initiative. This evaluation seeks to draw critical findings and potential lessons from the combined experience of the sites including: 1) how the models work in different communities; 2) the barriers and facilitators to implementing the models; and 3) outcomes of the model delivery. The evaluation team will also disseminate the findings with the goal of informing replication.

Detailed Description

Process Evaluation: The process evaluation will assess: 1) the training and technical assistance provided to sites; 2) the implementation of the models in the communities; and 3) characteristics of the service delivery systems.

Technical Assistance Providers will document the training and technical assistance (TTA) they provide to the sites.

Sites will be asked to identify key stakeholders to participate in interviews before the implementation begins and then two additional times during the demonstration phase. Key informant interviews will assess: recipient's perception of the training and technical assistance; model fidelity; model implementation (including model penetration, barriers and facilitators to implementation); and, perceptions of model impact. In addition to key informant interviews administrative data will be gathered to assess aspects of model implementation and systematic observations of law enforcement initiated screens will be conducted by a member of the evaluation team who will join patrol officers for "ride-alongs".

Impact Evaluation: The impact evaluation will assess changes in: 1) collaboration among service sectors; 2) supervision and sanctions for offenders; 3) recidivism and re-victimization; 4) victim reported feelings of safety; 5) utilization of resources; and 6) nature of safety planning.

System Collaboration will be assessed through a web-based survey completed at three time points by key stakeholders representing all potential partners in the community. Social network analysis will provide a visual depiction of how the network changes over time.

Victim Interviews will be conducted to determine the impact of involvement in the model program on their safety and wellbeing. Victims will be interviewed at three time points and will be asked about: prior and recent contact with law enforcement, domestic violence service providers or other providers; awareness of resources to address IPV; their safety and fear of their partner; coping strategies utilized; social support; financial resources; willingness to utilize criminal justice system and domestic violence service providers; both their and offenders behavior, beliefs and attitudes; self-reported mental health and substance abuse; their report of offenders substance abuse; and demographic information.

Administrative Data will be utilized to examine the breadth of the model implementation; the impact of the model programs on criminal justice processes; and whether there is a connection between the extent of post-risk assessment sanctions and services and the pattern of newly recorded incidents between the victim and offender. The evaluation will compare processing and outcomes across cases that are in many ways similar except that some cases were determined to be high risk and a risk assessment was completed and others where a risk assessment was not conducted. To facilitate these comparisons, the evaluation team will build a comprehensive database that will depict the "life-history" of each victim and offender dyad.

Study Timeline

• Study First Submitted: 2013-12-12
• Study First Submitted QC: 2013-12-19
• Study First Posted: 2013-12-27
• Study Start: 2014-01-01
• Primary Completion: 2020-12-31
• Study Completion: 2020-12-31
• Status Verified: 2021-03
• Last Update Submitted: 2021-03-19
• Last Update Posted: 2021-03-24

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: COMPLETED
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 666

Inclusion Criteria

Not provided

Read More

Exclusion Criteria

Not provided

Read More

Study & Design

• Study Type: OBSERVATIONAL
• Study Design: Not specified

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
Ohio	Domestic Violence High Risk Team	Domestic Violence High Risk Team
North Carolina	Lethality Assessment Program	Lethality Assessment Program
Illinois	Lethality Assessment Program	Lethality Assessment Program
California	Lethality Assessment Program	Lethality Assessment Program
Michigan	Lethality Assessment Program	Lethality Assessment Program
Tennessee	Lethality Assessment Program	Lethality Assessment Program

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Decreased frequency of re-assault	up to 3 years	Decrease in harassment, assault, injury, homicide/mortality

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Increased collaboration between network partners	up to 3 years	Increased information sharing, case planning, coordinated response
Increased victim reported safety	Up to 3 years	Victim reported changes in perceptions of safety
Increased sanctions for offender	Up to 3 years	Sanctions such as pre-trial containment, cases to trial, adjudications, containment post-adjudication
Increased safety planning	Up to 3 years	Increased safety planning at the time of police intervention
Increased awareness of and utilization of resources for victims	Up to 3 years	Increased awareness of and utilization of community resources

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Yale University; 🇺🇸 New Haven, Connecticut, United States