跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04550819
NCT04550819Unknown不适用

Prevention of Duodenobiliary Reflux Via Intraintestinal Extended Biliary Stents in Patients With Biliary Stricture

Peking University Third Hospital1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 724 人开始时间: 2020年10月1日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
入组人数
724
试验地点
1
主要终点
the duration of stent patency and stent occlusion rate

研究概览

简要总结

Metal or plastic biliary stents placement under Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography(ERCP) is a well-established treatment for patients with benign biliary obstruction to relieve jaundice, a palliative treatment for patients with unresectable malignant pancreaticobiliary obstruction and a bridge to surgery for patients with resectable disease. The main limitation of long time plastic stents is stents occlusion. Biliary plastic stents are changed every 2 to 3 months due to an expected median patency from 77 to 126 days.Metal stents present a lower risk of recurring biliary occlusion, yet high cost and stents occlusion are eventually inevitable. The mechanism of biliary stents occlusion include biliary sludge of the accumulation of bacteria and duodenal biliary reflux .The anti-reflux barrier of Oddi's sphincter disappears after the insertion of biliary stents and the pressure in bile duct lowers the duodenale, which cause the retrograde flow of duodenal material into the biliary ducts. Besides, ordinary biliary plastic stent is short which can also shortens the length of duodenal biliary reflux . Therefore, trying to prevent the duodenal biliary reflux is very important in reducing biliary stents occlusion and it is gradually concerned by clinical researchers. Some studies have showed that plastic stents with antireflux valves can effectively reduce the biliary stent stricture and prolong the stents patency, which means reducing duodenobiliary reflux is surely useful for keeping biliary stent patency.So,we assume to explore an innovatively intraintestinal extended biliary stents (reformed with nasobiliary tube ) as substitution for ordinary biliary plastic stent to prevent the duodenobiliary reflux by extending the length of duodenal content reflux and avoid the stents shift via suspending in intrahepatic duct. In this study,we will design a multicenter stratified randomized controlled trial to compare the patency of intraintestinal extended biliary stents and ordinary plastic biliary stents in patients with malignant or benign biliary obstruction respectively and evaluate the effect of intraintestinal extended biliary stents for the prevention of duodenobiliary reflux.

详细描述

Metal or plastic biliary stents placement under ERCP is a well-established treatment for patients with benign biliary obstruction to relieve jaundice, a palliative treatment for patients with unresectable malignant pancreaticobiliary obstruction and a bridge to surgery for patients with resectable disease. Single or multiple plastic stents are recommended for patients with benign stricture of the common bile duct or malignant stricture if the expected survival is less than 4 months. The main limitation of long time plastic stents is stents occlusion. Biliary plastic stents are changed every 2 to 3 months due to an expected median patency from 77 to 126 days.Metal stents present a lower risk of recurring biliary occlusion, yet high cost and stents occlusion are eventually inevitable. The mechanism of biliary stents occlusion include biliary sludge of the accumulation of bacteria and duodenal biliary reflux .The anti-reflux barrier of Oddi's sphincter disappears after the insertion of biliary stents and the pressure in bile duct lowers the duodenale, which cause the retrograde flow of duodenal material into the biliary ducts. Besides, ordinary biliary plastic stent is short which can also shortens the length of duodenal biliary reflux . Therefore, trying to prevent the duodenal biliary reflux is very important in reducing biliary stents occlusion and it is gradually concerned by clinical researchers. Some studies have showed that plastic stents with antireflux valves can effectively reduce the biliary stent stricture and prolong the stents patency, which means reducing duodenobiliary reflux is surely useful for keeping biliary stent patency.So,we assume to explore an innovatively intraintestinal extended biliary stents with length of 26cm (reformed with nasobiliary tube ) as substitution for ordinary biliary plastic stent to prevent the duodenobiliary reflux by extending the length of duodenal content reflux and avoid the stents shift via suspending in intrahepatic duct. In this study,we will design a multicenter stratified randomized controlled trial to compare the patency of intraintestinal extended biliary stents and ordinary plastic biliary stents in patients with malignant or benign biliary obstruction respectively and evaluate the effect of intraintestinal extended biliary stents for the prevention of duodenobiliary reflux.

This prospective study will be performed at 6 tertiary hospitals in China.The investigators will recruit patients according to admission criteria and exclusion criteria.The patients stratified by malignant and benign biliary obstruction will be randomized (at a 1:1 ratio) to intraintestinal extended biliary stents group (experimental group) and ordinary plastic biliary stents group (control group).The experimental groups will be placed the intraintestinal extended biliary stents in intrahepatic bile duct in ERCP. The control group will be placed ordinary plastic biliary stents in ERCP. The primary endpoint is the duration of stent patency and the rate of stent occlusion.The secondary outcomes include the mortality of each group、adverse events and the rate of technical success.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Prevention
盲法
Double (Participant, Care Provider)

入排标准

性别
All
接受健康志愿者
否

入选标准

  • •Malignant or benign extrahepatic biliary stricture,available for insertion of biliary stents in ERCP to alleviate biliary stricture

排除标准

  • •Patients with malignant or benign biliary stricture do not agree with endoscopic treatment
  • •Patients agree with metal biliary stents
  • •Patients with resectable biliary occlusion
  • •A guidewire could not be passed through the stricture
  • •Patients with an expected life survival <3months
  • •Patients with duodenal obstruction and duodenal endoscopy could not be reached to papillary

研究组 & 干预措施

IEBSs in malignant extrahepatic biliary stricture

Experimental

Intraintestinal extended biliary stents(IEBSs) in patients with malignant extrahepatic biliary stricture

干预措施: intraintestinal extended biliary stents (Procedure)

CPBSs in malignant extrahepatic biliary stricture

Active Comparator

Conventional plastic biliary stents(CPBSs) in patients with malignant extrahepatic biliary stricture

干预措施: ordinary plastic biliary stents (Procedure)

IEBSs in benign extrahepatic biliary stricture

Experimental

Intraintestinal extended biliary stents(IEBSs) in patients with benign extrahepatic biliary stricture

干预措施: intraintestinal extended biliary stents (Procedure)

CPBSs in benign extrahepatic biliary stricture

Active Comparator

Conventional plastic biliary stents(CPBSs) in patients with benign extrahepatic biliary stricture

干预措施: ordinary plastic biliary stents (Procedure)

结局指标

主要结局

the duration of stent patency and stent occlusion rate

时间窗: 12 months after ERCP

Patients with symptoms of cholangitis and worsening liver function tests suggestive of cholestasis are considered as premature stent occlusion.

次要结局

  • mortality of each group(12 months after ERCP)
  • the rate of technical success(12 months after ERCP)
  • adverse events(12 months after ERCP)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Huang Yonghui

Chief physician

Peking University Third Hospital

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验