跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04035577
NCT04035577已完成不适用

Expanding College Student Mental Health With Stress Management Mobile Technologies - Extended Usability Trial

Northwestern University1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 20 人开始时间: 2019年7月8日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
20
试验地点
1
主要终点
Patient Health Questionnaire - 8 (PHQ-8) - Depression Severity Module

研究概览

简要总结

This study is an 8-week usability and feasibility trial of the smartphone student stress-management app IntelliCare for college students. This intervention will be tested with University of Illinois at Chicago (UIC) and Northern Illinois University (NIU) students. During this period, research surveys assessing depression and anxiety can be completed on the app. Also, user feedback interviews will be conducted viatelephone at four weeks and at eight weeks to gain insight on the user experience of IntelliCare for College Students.

详细描述

In this study, students will be recruited for an 8-week trial in which they will be given the IntelliCare Hub app and encouraged to use it daily. To ensure a sample representative of likely end users, 10 students from each site will be recruited: 5 with elevated distress as measured by scores > 10 on either the PHQ-9 or GAD-7 and 5 without elevated scores on either measure, for a total of 20 participants. The rationale for 10 participants in each group is based on past usability research indicating saturation is typically reached within 10 participants. This trial aims to identify software bugs and usability problems that emerge over extended use and to examine preliminary effects of program use. During the trial, participants will be prompted to complete the PHQ-8 and GAD-7 every week. At baseline, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks, participants will be prompted within the app to complete the Depression Literacy Questionnaire and Anxiety Literacy Questionnaire to measure mental health literacy, the Knowledge and Beliefs about Services scale to measure knowledge of campus mental health services, the Barriers to Mental Health Help-Seeking questionnaire to measure treatment barriers, and the Cognitive and Behavioral Response to Stress Scale to measure cognitive and behavioral coping skills. At 4 and 8 weeks participants will be asked to participate in a user-feedback interview via the telephone. This is to gain insight on the user's experience with the app.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Na
干预模型
Single Group
主要目的
Supportive Care
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Participant is a student at the University of Illinois in Chicago or Northern Illinois University. Participant owns a smartphone capable of running Android 7 (or higher) or iOS11 (or higher).
  • Participant is 18 years of age or older

排除标准

  • 未提供

研究组 & 干预措施

Extended usability of a mobile self-help intervention

Experimental

Participants will have open access to the Intellicare Hub app for 8-weeks and be surveyed at Baseline, 4-weeks, and 8-weeks

干预措施: Mobile self-help intervention (Behavioral)

结局指标

主要结局

Patient Health Questionnaire - 8 (PHQ-8) - Depression Severity Module

时间窗: Week 8

The PHQ-8 measures degree of depression severity. Possible range of scores for the PHQ-9 is 0-24. Higher values represent a worse outcome. Specifically, scores of 0-4 indicate minimal or no depression; 5-9 is mild; 10-14 is moderate; 15-19 is moderately severe; and 20-24 is severe.

GAD-7 (Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale-7)

时间窗: Week 8

The GAD-7 is a self-administered 7 item instrument that uses some of the DSM-V criteria for GAD (General Anxiety Disorder) to identify probable cases of GAD along with measuring anxiety symptom severity. GAD-7 total score for the seven items ranges from 0 to 21. Higher values represent a worse outcome. Specifically, scores of 1-4 indicate minimal anxiety symptoms; 5-9 is mild anxiety symptoms; 10-14 is moderate anxiety symptoms; and 15-21 is severe anxiety symptoms.

Anxiety Literacy Questionnaire

时间窗: Week 8

This questionnaire is designed to assess anxiety specific mental health literacy by presenting 22 true or false statements regarding anxiety (e.g., "Being easily fatigued may be a symptom of anxiety disorder.") Participants receive a score of 1 for each statement they correctly assign as either true or false. Scores for each questionnaire can range from 0-22, with higher scores indicating greater anxiety specific mental health literacy.

Depression Literacy Questionnaire

时间窗: Week 8

This questionnaire is designed to assess depression specific mental health literacy by presenting 22 true or false statements regarding anxiety and depression (e.g., "Loss of confidence and poor self-esteem may be a symptom of depression.") Participants receive a score of 1 for each statement they correctly assign as either true or false. Scores for each questionnaire can range from 0-22, with higher scores indicating greater depression specific mental health literacy

Cognitive and Behavioral Response to Stress Scale

时间窗: Week 4

This is an 18-item scale designed to measure the use and helpfulness of various cognitive and behavioral skills. There are four subscales included: cognitive skill frequency, cognitive skill usefulness, behavioral skill frequency, and behavioral skill usefulness. For each cognitive or behavioral skill, participants rate how often they used the skill and how helpful it was (e.g. "During the past month, how often did you take a moment to notice things that made you feel good or grateful? How helpful was this in making you feel better?"). Scores for cognitive subscales range from 0-24, and scores from behavioral subscales can range from 0-30. Higher scores indicate better outcomes.

The Cognitive and Behavioral Response to Stress Scale

时间窗: Week 8

This is an 18-item scale designed to measure the use and helpfulness of various cognitive and behavioral skills. There are four subscales included: cognitive skill frequency, cognitive skill usefulness, behavioral skill frequency, and behavioral skill usefulness. For each cognitive or behavioral skill, participants rate how often they used the skill and how helpful it was (e.g. "During the past month, how often did you take a moment to notice things that made you feel good or grateful? How helpful was this in making you feel better?"). Scores for cognitive subscales range from 0-24, and scores from behavioral subscales can range from 0-30. Higher scores indicate better outcomes.

次要结局

  • Mean Number of Treatment App Use Sessions(Daily for two months)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Emily G Lattie

Assistant Professor

Northwestern University

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验