MedPath

A Comparative Analysis of REVOLVE, LipoGrafter, and Viality in Autologous Fat Grafting During Breast Surgery

Not Applicable
Recruiting
Conditions
Mammaplasty
Mastectomy
Breast Reconstruction
Interventions
Device: REVOLVE Advanced Adipose System
Procedure: Viality
Device: LipoGrafter
Registration Number
NCT04891510
Lead Sponsor
Weill Medical College of Cornell University
Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to learn whether there is a superior fat processing method in terms of graft retention in breast reconstruction after mastectomy.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
Female
Target Recruitment
135
Inclusion Criteria
  • Female;
  • Documented history of previous breast surgery (either complete or partial mastectomy);
  • Available harvest sites for fat grafting as documented by plastic surgeon;
  • BMI > 20;
  • Anticipated harvested fat volume > 50cc;
  • Competency and willingness to provide consent
Exclusion Criteria
  • Suspected or known to be pregnant

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
REVOLVE Advanced Adipose SystemREVOLVE Advanced Adipose SystemParticipants will receive the REVOLVE Advanced Adipose System technique during breast reconstruction.
VialityVialityParticipants will receive the Viality technique during breast reconstruction.
LipoGrafterLipoGrafterParticipants will receive the LipoGrafter technique during breast reconstruction.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change in efficacy of fat grafting technique, as measured by 3D volumetric scanning at the surgical siteBaseline, 90 day follow-up

3D volumetric scanning assesses the fat graft retention defined as the ratio of fat remaining at the surgical site at 90 day follow-up to that at pre-operative baseline.

Change in patient satisfaction of fat grafting technique, as measured by the BREAST-Q questionnaireBaseline, 90 day follow-up

The BREAST-Q questionnaire is used for measuring pre- and postoperative psychosocial, physical, and sexual well-being, satisfaction with breasts, experience of care, and satisfaction with outcome. Scores range on a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better outcomes.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Number of palpable masses from the fat grafting technique, as measured by a physical exam.90 day follow-up

The physical exam will provide the number of palpable masses at the surgical site.

Presence seroma from the fat grafting technique, as measured by a physical exam90 day follow-up

The physical exam will show if there is seroma present at the surgical site. This is a binary "yes/no" item.

Number of lesions of probable fat necrosis from the fat grafting technique, as measured by a physical exam90 day follow-up

The physical exam will provide the number of lesions of probable fat necrosis at the surgical site

Presence of infection from the fat grafting technique, as measured by a physical exam90 day follow-up

The physical exam will show if there is infection present at the surgical site. This is a binary "yes/no" item.

Assessment of wound healing from the fat grafting technique, as measured by a physical exam90 day follow-up

The physical exam will show if wound healing is normal or delayed at the surgical site. This is a binary "normal/delayed" item.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

New York Presbyterian - Weill Cornell Medicine

🇺🇸

New York, New York, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath