CTRI/2024/03/064359Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Abdominal Closure after Emergency Laparotomy (ACE) trial: Comparison of Mass closureand Small bites techniques for closure after emergency laparotomy - ACE
Dr Babasaheb Ambedkar Hospital0 sites0 target enrollmentStarted: TBDLast updated:
Trial Snapshot
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Status
- Not yet recruiting
- Sponsor
Study Overview
Brief Summary
No summary available.
Study Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •All patients undergoing emergency laparotomy with a midline abdominal incision
Exclusion Criteria
- •1. Pregnant women
- •2. Patients with non midline incision used to open the abdomen
- •3. Patients undergoing damage control laparotomy
Investigators
Similar Trials
Completed
Not Applicable
Is abdominal drainage after open emergency appendectomy for complicated appendicitis beneficial or waste of money? A retrospective cohort studycomplicated appendicitis (perforated appendicitis with localized abscess formation )ACTRN12618000995279Kerbala Medical university245
Terminated
Not Applicable
Is telephone consultation a safe, satisfactory and cost-effective alternative to outpatient review for follow up post emergency laparoscopic appendicectomy and cholecystectomy?ACTRN12616001142426Monash Health220
Unknown
Phase 2
Continuous Versus Interrupted Abdominal Wall Closure After Emergency Midline LaparotomyLaparotomyHerniaNCT00544583Heidelberg University80
Completed
Not Applicable
Open abdomen for treatment of abdominal trauma depending on impact and injury pattern – A matched-pairs analysis from the TraumaRegister DGU®S36.15DRKS00023988Bundeswehrzentralkrankenhaus Koblenz, Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Thoraxchirurgie785
Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable
Effect of prophylactic closure after colonic endoscopic submucosal dissectioKCT0001666Konkuk University Medical Center80