A Comparative Prospective Study of Meniscal Repair Methods in Young Patients With Traumatic Meniscal Tears.
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Not specified
- Sponsor
- Vilnius University
- Enrollment
- 100
- Locations
- 2
- Primary Endpoint
- Pediatric International Documentation Committee Subjective (Pedi-IKDC) Knee Form.
- Status
- Recruiting
- Last Updated
- 8 months ago
Overview
Brief Summary
Performing arthroscopic meniscus repair following a traumatic meniscus tear as an alternative to a meniscectomy is now an acceptable choice. Preserving meniscus tissues is crucial due to the significant role they play as an essential part of the knee joint. It is essential to comprehend the additional tools that can impact the recovery of the meniscus after suturing. Patients have been randomly assigned into two groups using the computer "www.randomiser.org," and the treatment outcomes were compared after one year. One group of patients has received a standard meniscus suturing technique, whereas another group has experienced the meniscus suturing treatment with an additional fibrin clot approach. Data pertaining to demographics, clinical characteristics, radiological findings, and survey responses have been carefully collected prospectively.
Investigators
Viktorija Brogaite
Viktorija Brogaite Martinkeniene MD
Vilnius University
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Individuals who provide consent to participate in the study, including patients and their care providers. The inclusion criteria for this study are as follows: being under the age of 19, having a traumatic isolated full-thickness meniscal tear longer than 1cm that has been confirmed by both preoperative MRI and arthroscopy, and not having undergone any previous surgery on the affected knee.
Exclusion Criteria
- •This investigation excludes patients with developmental disabilities who are unable to read or interpret in their native language.
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Pediatric International Documentation Committee Subjective (Pedi-IKDC) Knee Form.
Time Frame: before treatment, after 12 months and 24 months following treatment
Pedi-IKDC is used to measure knee-related symptoms, function, and sports activity among children. The questionnaire consists of 13 items, each of which is scored using one of three rating systems: a range of 0 to 10 for items 2, 3, 12, and 13, a range of 0 to 4 for items 1, 4, 5, 6, 9, and 10, and a range of 0 to 1 for items 7 and 8. The 11th item consists of nine subquestions, each of which can be scored from 0 to 4. The overall score value is calculated by adding only the responses to 12 items and dividing the total by 92 (the highest number of points attainable). The score runs from 0 (worst case scenario) to 100 (best case scenario). The Pedi-IKDC has been proven to be a valid, trustworthy, and responsive questionnaire in a paediatric population with varied knee disorders, especially ligament and meniscal injuries, joint instability, and other disorders
Lysholm knee scale
Time Frame: before treatment, after 12 months and 24 months following treatment
Lysholm knee scoring scale has been proven to be suitable for a variety of knee pathologies and also for the adolescent population. The scale comprises eight items. Higher values of the score indicate better functioning of the knee. (range from 0 to 100).
Health-related paediatric quality of life (PedsQL)
Time Frame: before treatment, after 12 months and 24 months following treatment
PedsQL is a generic score, which estimates the quality of life of paediatric patients. The questionnaire consists of four domains with 23 questions: the general physical functioning, emotional, social, and functioning at school domains
Secondary Outcomes
- Clinical evaluation at 12 and 24 months postoperatively. The clinical assessment involves evaluating of pain, swelling and estimating and comparing the range of motion of the knee with the contralateral side.(12 and 24 months postoperatively.)
- magnetic resonance imaging (MRI scan) of the knee(before treatment, after 12 months and 24 months following treatment)
- Revision rates (secondary arthroscopies)(12 and 24 month following primary surgery)