Comparison of soft tissue healing after tooth socket preservation technique using gelatin sponge with or without i-PRF, in systemically healthy adult individuals: A Split-Mouth double blindedrandomized controlled clinical trial.
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: K088- Other specified disorders of teethand supporting structures
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2023/01/048767
- Lead Sponsor
- DR SAYALI KUTE
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
1. Subjects aged between 20 to 60 years.
2. Systemically healthy patients and not under any medications
3. Atraumatic extraction of whole tooth maxillary or mandibular
molar.
4. Clinical probing distance between the gingival margin and alveolar
crest (immediately after extraction) not more than 3mm at buccal
and/or lingual side.
5. Intact bony walls of socket of teeth after extraction
6. Non tobacco chewer, Non-smoker.
7. Non-alcoholic individuals.
Exclusion Criteria
1. Fracture of alveolar crest while extraction of teeth.
2. Pregnant and lactating patients.
3. Tooth with large periapical pathology ( >5mm).
4. Patient not ready to volunteer for the study protocol and follow
ups.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method There is difference in soft tissue healing after socket preservation <br/ ><br>technique using gelatin sponge with or without i-PRF, in systemically <br/ ><br>healthy adult individuals.Timepoint: 6 WEEKS FOLLOW UP
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method There is difference in contour changes after socket preservation <br/ ><br>technique using gelatin sponge with or without i-PRF, in systemically <br/ ><br>healthy adult individuals.Timepoint: 6 WEEKS FOLLOW UP