Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT00149500
NCT00149500
Completed
Not Applicable

Social Support and Education in Asthma Follow-up (SSEA)

Washington University School of Medicine1 site in 1 country241 target enrollmentSeptember 2003
ConditionsAsthma

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Asthma
Sponsor
Washington University School of Medicine
Enrollment
241
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
ER visits
Status
Completed
Last Updated
7 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

We will evaluate the effect of an eighteen-month asthma coaching intervention for parents/caregivers of children with asthma to reduce asthma morbidity. The primary objective is to determine if asthma coaching will significantly reduce asthma morbidity as measured by a reduction in the number of ED visits and hospitalizations for the children during the 18 months of active coaching and during the 18 months after the coaching stops.

We will provide half of the subjects (parents/caregivers) with access to assistance from an asthma coach for 18 months (including 2 contacts with an asthma nurse during the first 6 months). The other half of the subjects will not have an asthma coach, but their children will have their usual routine care with their primary care providers. The nurse and coach will help the subjects learn more about caring for their children's asthma and improving interactions with the primary care providers for their children.

Detailed Description

BACKGROUND: Our previous NHLBI-supported study (HL 57232) showed that a combination treatment of "Coaching" through follow-up phone calls 2 and 5 days following an index ED visit plus monetary incentive was highly effective in increasing the percentage of low-income urban children who received recommended primary care within 2 weeks of the ED visit for asthma, 44% in the intervention group vs 29% in usual care (p = 0.0004). However, the intervention was not associated with significant differences in morbidity (subsequent ED visits). We conclude that the intervention was effective in promoting the initial link to primary care, but was not effective in sustaining that link or management practices to minimize acuity of symptoms during exacerbation. DESIGN NARRATIVE: Primary outcome The proportion of children of subjects in each group who have at least one ED visit for acute asthma symptoms during the thirty-six month period following enrollment. Key secondary outcomes A. The proportion of children of subjects in each group who are hospitalized during the thirty-six month period following enrollment. B. The proportion of children of subjects in each group who have either acute asthma visits or asthma-planning visits with their primary care providers. C. The costs of asthma-related care during the thirty-six month period D. Variables which may mediate or moderate the intervention such as the attitudes toward asthma care of the subjects and the personal social support perceived by the subjects .

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
September 2003
End Date
May 2008
Last Updated
7 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Sponsor

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Not provided

Exclusion Criteria

  • Not provided

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

ER visits

Time Frame: 18 months

Documenting the number of ER visits per patient in the 18 month period.

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials