跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT02313480
NCT02313480已完成不适用

Does the Addition of Massage to Manual Therapy and Exercise Improve Outcome in Chronic Neck Pain?

Society of Musculoskeletal Medicine0 个研究点目标入组 39 人开始时间: 2013年4月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
39
主要终点
Numerical Pain Rating Scale

研究概览

简要总结

To date, the benefits of massage in chronic neck pain patients has only been investigated as a singular treatment, rather than as part of a treatment package. The need for this research has been highlighted in the literature (Ezzo et al, 2007; Haraldsson et al, 2006) This research aimed to establish whether the addition of massage to a program of exercise and manual therapy offers any additional benefits over exercise and manual therapy alone in the treatment of patients with chronic neck pain.

详细描述

39 patients with neck pain of greater than three months duration were randomised to either a massage or non-massage group in a primary care setting in the Dublin region. One therapist administered all treatments. Randomisation was carried out by the use of sequential sampling, utilising permuted blocks. Patients were excluded from the study if they had severe co-existing disease, had neck pain due to fracture, tumour, infection or other non-mechanical causes, or if the patient had a diagnosis of osteoporosis anywhere in the body.

Both groups underwent up to eight weekly physiotherapy sessions. The non-massage group received exercise, manual therapy and advice over the 30 minute intervention period, in conjunction with an exercise program to perform at home. The massage group received all of the above as well as Swedish massage. Follow up was for the duration of treatment only.

A number of T-tests and non-parametric tests were conducted to establish if the two groups were comparable at baseline.

A mixed ANOVA was then used to analyse between-group and within-group data simultaneously. No blinding was possible, although the questionnaires were self-administered which may have limited bias.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • neck pain for greater than three months
  • over 18 years of age
  • had not received treatment for their neck pain in the previous month
  • could speak conversational English
  • were not involved in any current compensation case and
  • had provided written, informed consent.

排除标准

  • severe co-existing disease,
  • neck pain due to fracture, tumour, infection or other non-mechanical causes,
  • if the patient had a diagnosis of osteoporosis anywhere in the body.

结局指标

主要结局

Numerical Pain Rating Scale

时间窗: Compared baseline to score after 8 weeks of treatment

Used to accurately measure pain. On this, patients verbally rated their usual and worst (in the last week) pain from 0 ("no pain") to 10 ("worst possible pain"). Its test-retest reliability in the chronic neck pain population was established as fair to moderate (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) =.76; 95% CI, .51-.87) by Cleland et al (2008). Farrar et al (2010) found a difference of two points to be a clinically meaningful change in the chronic pain population.

次要结局

  • Neck Disability Index(Compared baseline to score after 8 weeks of treatment)

研究者

发起方
Society of Musculoskeletal Medicine
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

相似试验