Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT04279678
NCT04279678
Unknown
Not Applicable

Surgical Strategies in Moderate Ischemic Mitral Insufficiency in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Graft

Assiut University1 site in 1 country50 target enrollmentMarch 2020

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Moderate Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation
Sponsor
Assiut University
Enrollment
50
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
To compare the outcome of mitral valve repair plus CABG vs CABG alone.
Last Updated
6 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

Ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR) is a common complication of myocardial infarction, with a reported prevalence of 13-59%. Approximately one-third of these patients have at least moderate MR .

Detailed Description

Ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR) is a common complication of myocardial infarction, with a reported prevalence of 13-59%. Approximately one-third of these patients have at least moderate MR . The mechanism of IMR is complex and multifactorial.IMR results from the distortion and remodeling of the left ventricle after myocardial infarction ,where the papillary muscles are displaced away from the annular plane. Coupled with annular flattening, enlargement, and decreased contraction, this spatial deformation exerts traction on the chordae tendineae, leading to mal-coaptation of the structurally normal mitral valve and subsequently to secondary MR. Furthermore, the MR-related left ventricular(LV) volume overload promotes LV remodeling, resulting in exacerbation of the MR (MR begets more MR) . Two patterns of leaflet tethering have been reported in secondary MR: asymmetric tethering and symmetric tethering. Asymmetric tethering occurs with regional LV remodeling, resulting in displacement of the posterior papillary muscle in a lateral direction. Symmetric tethering generally results from global LV remodeling, resulting in apical tethering of both the anterior and posterior papillary muscles. Most studies show that severe IMR is not usually improved by revascularization alone and that residual MR is associated with an increased mortality risk. It is generally accepted that severe IMR should be corrected at the time of Coronary artery bypass grafting(CABG). Surgical correction of moderate IMR at the time of coronary revascularization is still an unresolved controversy.CABG alone did reduce MR at follow-up; nevertheless, CABG alone cannot be sufficient to eliminate MR in all cases , Adding mitral valve annuloplasty to CABG may eliminate MR immediately after surgery; however, recurrent MR did occur after CABG plus mitral valve annuloplasty, and no benefit for long-term survival was observed. There was also a tendency toward higher morbidity and mortality in CABG plus mitral valve procedure as compared with CABG alone in high-risk patients with moderate IMR. The latest American Association for Thoracic Surgery (AATS)guidelines suggested that for moderate IMR, mitral valve repair with an undersized complete rigid ring annuloplasty "may be considered" during CABG surgery, but not necessarily "preferred" over revascularization alone.Therefore ,the benefits of adding mitral valve procedure to CABG for treating moderate IMR have not been clearly established. This study is aiming to determine the short term morbidity in patients undergoing CABG alone and comparing them with patients undergoing concomitant MV repair by assessment of morbidity and mortality in both groups postoperatively .

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
March 2020
End Date
December 2023
Last Updated
6 years ago
Study Type
Observational
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Mohamad Zidane Roushdi

Principal Investigator

Assiut University

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • All patient with multi-vessel coronary artery disease with moderate degree of ischemic mitral regurgitation .
  • Patient undergone surgery using cardiopulmonary bypass.
  • Patient done on elective basis

Exclusion Criteria

  • CABG done by off-pump technique.
  • patients not candidates for complete revascularization.
  • patients with other valvular affection other than mitral valve.
  • Patients done on emergency basis.
  • patient known to have Rheumatic valvular heart disease.

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

To compare the outcome of mitral valve repair plus CABG vs CABG alone.

Time Frame: post operative ECHO assessment after 6 months.

the aim is to determine whether there is significant difference postoperatively in patients undergoing mitral valve repair+CABG and those with CABG only regarding post operative degree of MR.

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials