MedPath

Pain Education and Patient-led Goal Setting in Adults With Chronic Low Back Pain: a Randomised Controlled Trial

Not Applicable
Recruiting
Conditions
Chronic Low Back Pain (Non-specific, Uncomplicated)
Interventions
Other: Supervised group exercise
Other: Pain education and patient-led goal setting
Registration Number
NCT06620133
Lead Sponsor
Neuroscience Research Australia
Brief Summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to investigate the effectiveness of two treatments for adults with chronic low back pain. The main question this study seeks to answer is "In adults with chronic low back pain, what is the effectiveness of pain education and patient-led goal setting compared to guideline-based written advice on reducing pain intensity and disability?".

A total of 392 participants will be randomised into two groups: 1) pain education and patient-led goal setting or 2) guideline-based written advice. Participants randomised to the pain education and patient-led goal setting group will receive 5 sessions of 45-60 min each over 8 weeks delivered online via telehealth. Participants randomised to written advice group will receive information developed for people with chronic low back pain. Outcomes will be assessed at baseline and week 8, 26 and 52.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
392
Inclusion Criteria
  • Low back pain of at least 3 months duration
  • physically inactive (less than or equal to 150min/week moderate intensity physical activity; 75 min/week vigorous activity, or some combination of the two)
  • no known contraindication(s) to performing physical activity
  • English language proficiency
  • access to internet
Exclusion Criteria
  • physically active (more than 150min/week moderate intensity physical activity, 75 min/week vigorous activity, or some combination of the two)
  • known contraindication(s) to performing physical activity
  • known or suspected serious spinal pathology (fracture, metastatic, inflammatory or infective diseases of the spine, cauda equina syndrome/widespread neurological disorder)
  • scheduled for major surgery during the treatment or follow-up period

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Supervised group exerciseSupervised group exerciseSupervised group exercise
Pain education and patient-led goal settingPain education and patient-led goal settingPain education and patient-led goal setting
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Pain intensityWeek 26 post-randomisation

Average pain intensity over the previous 7 days assessed using the 11-point Numerical Pain Rating Scale

DisabilityWeek 26 post-randomisation

Self-reported disability assessed using the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ); scale range 0-24; lower scores indicate lower disability

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Pain intensityWeeks 8 and 52 post-randomisation

Average pain intensity over the previous 7 days assessed using the 11-point Numerical Pain Rating Scale

DisabilityWeeks 8 and 52 post-randomisation

Self-reported disability assessed using the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ); scale range 0-24; lower scores indicate lower disability

Pain self-efficacyWeeks 8, 26 and 52 post-randomisation

Pain self-efficacy assessed using the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ); scale range 0-60; higher scores indicate greater pain self-efficacy

Back beliefsWeeks 8, 26 and 52 post-randomisation

Back beliefs assessed using the Back Beliefs Questionnaire (BBQ); scale range 9-45, lower scores indicate more pessimistic beliefs about the consequences of low back pain

KinesiophobiaWeeks 8, 26 and 52 post-randomisation

Fear of movement (re)injury assessed by the short-form of the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia; scale range 4-16 (higher scores indicate greater kinesiophobia)

EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L)Weeks 8, 26 and 52 post-randomisation

Health-Related Quality of Life assessed using the EQ-5D-5L dimensions scale range, 1-5; higher scores indicate better quality of life) and health thermometer (range, 0-100; higher scores indicate better quality of life).

Daily step countWeek 8 post-randomisation

Average daily step count over the past 7 days assessed using accelerometry.

Light intensity physical activityWeek 8 post-randomisation

Light intensity physical activity (min/day) over the past 7 days assessed using accelerometry

Moderate-vigorous intensity physical activityWeek 8 post-randomisation

Moderate-vigorous intensity physical activity (min/day) over the past 7 days assessed using accelerometry

Sedentary timeWeek 8 post-randomisation

Sedentary time (min/day) over the past 7 days assessed using accelerometry

Subjective physical activity levelsWeeks 8, 26 and 52 post-randomisation

Self-reported physical activity over the previous 7 days assessed using the short-form of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ)

Blood pressureWeek 8 post-randomisation

Blood pressure at rest assessed via an automated sphygmomanometer

Adverse eventsFrom randomisation to Week 8 post-randomisation

Adverse events assessed via self-report

Adherence to treatmentFrom randomisation to Week 8 post-randomisation

Adherence to treatment assessed via session attendance and self-report (diary)

Lifestyle risk factorsWeeks 8, 26 and 52 post-randomisation

Diet (do you eat less than two serves of fruit per day? (yes/no); do you eat less than fives serves of vegetables per day? (yes/no)).

Alcohol intake (On average, how much alcohol do you drink each week? (I rarely/never drink alcohol; Less than 14 standard drinks; Between 14 and 21 standard drinks; More than 21 standard drinks)

Total healthcare costsWeeks 8, 26 and 52 post-randomisation

Total health-care costs will be estimated as the trial intervention costs and outside trial health-care resource use attributable to chronic low back pain from the Medicare Benefits Scheme and Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme. Quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) from the EQ-5D-5L using the Australian utility weights will also be used in the trial-based cost-utility analysis.

Goal attainment (goal setting arm only)Weeks 8, 26 and 52 post-randomisation

Goal attainment assessed using the goal attainment scale. Each goal is rated on a 5-point scale: +2 = much more than expected, +1 = somewhat more than expected, 0 = Patient achieves the expected level, -1 = somewhat less than expected, -2 = much less than expected.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Neuroscience Research Australia

🇦🇺

Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath