Pain Education and Patient-led Goal Setting in Adults With Chronic Low Back Pain: a Randomised Controlled Trial
- Conditions
- Chronic Low Back Pain (Non-specific, Uncomplicated)
- Interventions
- Other: Supervised group exerciseOther: Pain education and patient-led goal setting
- Registration Number
- NCT06620133
- Lead Sponsor
- Neuroscience Research Australia
- Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to investigate the effectiveness of two treatments for adults with chronic low back pain. The main question this study seeks to answer is "In adults with chronic low back pain, what is the effectiveness of pain education and patient-led goal setting compared to guideline-based written advice on reducing pain intensity and disability?".
A total of 392 participants will be randomised into two groups: 1) pain education and patient-led goal setting or 2) guideline-based written advice. Participants randomised to the pain education and patient-led goal setting group will receive 5 sessions of 45-60 min each over 8 weeks delivered online via telehealth. Participants randomised to written advice group will receive information developed for people with chronic low back pain. Outcomes will be assessed at baseline and week 8, 26 and 52.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 392
- Low back pain of at least 3 months duration
- physically inactive (less than or equal to 150min/week moderate intensity physical activity; 75 min/week vigorous activity, or some combination of the two)
- no known contraindication(s) to performing physical activity
- English language proficiency
- access to internet
- physically active (more than 150min/week moderate intensity physical activity, 75 min/week vigorous activity, or some combination of the two)
- known contraindication(s) to performing physical activity
- known or suspected serious spinal pathology (fracture, metastatic, inflammatory or infective diseases of the spine, cauda equina syndrome/widespread neurological disorder)
- scheduled for major surgery during the treatment or follow-up period
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Supervised group exercise Supervised group exercise Supervised group exercise Pain education and patient-led goal setting Pain education and patient-led goal setting Pain education and patient-led goal setting
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Pain intensity Week 26 post-randomisation Average pain intensity over the previous 7 days assessed using the 11-point Numerical Pain Rating Scale
Disability Week 26 post-randomisation Self-reported disability assessed using the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ); scale range 0-24; lower scores indicate lower disability
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Pain intensity Weeks 8 and 52 post-randomisation Average pain intensity over the previous 7 days assessed using the 11-point Numerical Pain Rating Scale
Disability Weeks 8 and 52 post-randomisation Self-reported disability assessed using the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ); scale range 0-24; lower scores indicate lower disability
Pain self-efficacy Weeks 8, 26 and 52 post-randomisation Pain self-efficacy assessed using the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ); scale range 0-60; higher scores indicate greater pain self-efficacy
Back beliefs Weeks 8, 26 and 52 post-randomisation Back beliefs assessed using the Back Beliefs Questionnaire (BBQ); scale range 9-45, lower scores indicate more pessimistic beliefs about the consequences of low back pain
Kinesiophobia Weeks 8, 26 and 52 post-randomisation Fear of movement (re)injury assessed by the short-form of the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia; scale range 4-16 (higher scores indicate greater kinesiophobia)
EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L) Weeks 8, 26 and 52 post-randomisation Health-Related Quality of Life assessed using the EQ-5D-5L dimensions scale range, 1-5; higher scores indicate better quality of life) and health thermometer (range, 0-100; higher scores indicate better quality of life).
Daily step count Week 8 post-randomisation Average daily step count over the past 7 days assessed using accelerometry.
Light intensity physical activity Week 8 post-randomisation Light intensity physical activity (min/day) over the past 7 days assessed using accelerometry
Moderate-vigorous intensity physical activity Week 8 post-randomisation Moderate-vigorous intensity physical activity (min/day) over the past 7 days assessed using accelerometry
Sedentary time Week 8 post-randomisation Sedentary time (min/day) over the past 7 days assessed using accelerometry
Subjective physical activity levels Weeks 8, 26 and 52 post-randomisation Self-reported physical activity over the previous 7 days assessed using the short-form of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ)
Blood pressure Week 8 post-randomisation Blood pressure at rest assessed via an automated sphygmomanometer
Adverse events From randomisation to Week 8 post-randomisation Adverse events assessed via self-report
Adherence to treatment From randomisation to Week 8 post-randomisation Adherence to treatment assessed via session attendance and self-report (diary)
Lifestyle risk factors Weeks 8, 26 and 52 post-randomisation Diet (do you eat less than two serves of fruit per day? (yes/no); do you eat less than fives serves of vegetables per day? (yes/no)).
Alcohol intake (On average, how much alcohol do you drink each week? (I rarely/never drink alcohol; Less than 14 standard drinks; Between 14 and 21 standard drinks; More than 21 standard drinks)Total healthcare costs Weeks 8, 26 and 52 post-randomisation Total health-care costs will be estimated as the trial intervention costs and outside trial health-care resource use attributable to chronic low back pain from the Medicare Benefits Scheme and Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme. Quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) from the EQ-5D-5L using the Australian utility weights will also be used in the trial-based cost-utility analysis.
Goal attainment (goal setting arm only) Weeks 8, 26 and 52 post-randomisation Goal attainment assessed using the goal attainment scale. Each goal is rated on a 5-point scale: +2 = much more than expected, +1 = somewhat more than expected, 0 = Patient achieves the expected level, -1 = somewhat less than expected, -2 = much less than expected.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Neuroscience Research Australia
🇦🇺Sydney, New South Wales, Australia