MedPath

Comparing the pros and cons by conventional and digital method for assessing @ Home Leprosy contact tracing and management.

Not Applicable
Registration Number
CTRI/2023/08/056833
Lead Sponsor
Hi Rapid Lab Pvt Ltd
Brief Summary

Not available

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
ot Yet Recruiting
Sex
Not specified
Target Recruitment
0
Inclusion Criteria

1-The staff assigned to the study at the PHCs. 2-The staff in whose allocated villages/locations a new case occurs during the study.

3-The staff is assigned to manage leprosy cases and/or conduct home visits for contact screening and PEP distribution.

4-The staff who have used the mHealth application for leprosy contact tracing and PEP distribution.

Exclusion Criteria

Participants not willing to participate

Study & Design

Study Type
Observational
Study Design
Not specified
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
To access the knowledge about the current workflow (Paper-based & App-based), address the gaps, challenges, & perceptions regarding the traditional and conventional method of contact screening and PEP implementation.Timepoint: 5 days
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
To identify the time duration per worker per day, time taken to complete each module, & time taken to complete the entire process, strengths, and weaknesses of both the systems..Timepoint: 5 days
© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath