Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT05813158
NCT05813158
Completed
Phase 2

Comparing the Perioperative Analgesic Effect of Two Different Volumes of Local Anesthetic Solution in Erector Spinae Plane Block in Patients Undergoing Modified Radical Mastectomy A Randomized Comparative Study

Cairo University1 site in 1 country52 target enrollmentSeptember 9, 2022

Overview

Phase
Phase 2
Intervention
Group 1(low concentration-high volume bupivacaine US guided Erector Spinae Plane block)
Conditions
Comparing of 2 Different Volumes in ESPB in Patients Undergoing MRM
Sponsor
Cairo University
Enrollment
52
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Total dose of morphine needed postoperatively
Status
Completed
Last Updated
3 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

The aim of this study is to compare and evaluate the analgesic effects of ultrasound-guided Erector Spinae Plane block using low volumes and high concentrations versus high volumes and low concentrations in patients undergoing MRM.

Detailed Description

Multiple regional techniques have been developed in recent years for postoperative analgesia of breast surgery including ESPB aiming to be effective and associated with less complications when compared to the gold standard techniques (thoracic epidural analgesia or paravertebral block).. Ultrasound guided erector spinae plane (ESPB) block was described in 2016 as a novel regional anesthetic technique for acute and chronic thoracic pain, it has been used as a regional anesthetic technique for breast surgery based on case reports and case series. It is a paraspinal fascial plane block that involves injection of local anesthetic deep in the erector spinae muscle and superficial to the tips of the thoracic transverse processes. The site of injection is distant from the pleura, major blood vessels, and spinal cord; hence, performing the ESPB has relatively few contraindications. The injected local anesthetic drug blocks the ventral and dorsal rami of spinal nerves on the paravertebral area . Multiple studies have reported improved efficiency of interfascial blocks by increasing the volume of injection promoting better spread of local anesthesia. According to the authors best knowledge there is no studies comparing different volumes and concentration in ESPB in patients undergoing MRM This study aims to see the effect of fixing the drug mass of anaesthetic given in both groups, while altering the concentration of the anesthetic and total volume administered. One group will receive a lower concentration and higher volume, while the other will receive a higher concentration and lower volume.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
September 9, 2022
End Date
December 23, 2022
Last Updated
3 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
Female

Investigators

Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Ahmed Abdalla

Professor of Anesthesia &I.C.U and Pain Clinic, Cairo University

Cairo University

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Age starting from 18 to 60 years.
  • Genders eligible for study: female sex.
  • ASA II-III.
  • Patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy.
  • Body mass index (BMI) from 18.5 to 30 kg/m2.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Patient refusal
  • Known allergy to local anesthetics
  • Bleeding disorders; platelets count \<50,000, prothrombin concentration \<60% or any coagulopathy disorder.
  • Use of any anti-coagulants
  • Inability to provide informed consent
  • Neurological disorders
  • Patient with psychiatric disorders

Arms & Interventions

Group 1

Patients will preoperatively receive low concentration-high volume U/S ESP block, and then the patient will be transferred to the operating room one syringe of 30ml bupivacaine 0.25% {15 ml bupivacaine 0.5% and 15ml normal saline}, for each patient.

Intervention: Group 1(low concentration-high volume bupivacaine US guided Erector Spinae Plane block)

Group 2

Patients will preoperatively receive high concentration-low volume U/S ESP block block, and then the patient will be transferred to the operating room one syringe of 15 ml bupivacaine 0.5% {15 ml bupivacaine 0.5% }, for each patien).

Intervention: Group 2(high concentration-low volumecbupivacaine US guided Erector Spinae Plane block)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Total dose of morphine needed postoperatively

Time Frame: Through Study Completion Up to 1 Day

Total dose of morphine needed postoperatively

Secondary Outcomes

  • Time to first rescue analgesia, starting after extubation(Through Study Completion over the first 24 hours postoperative)
  • Duration of surgery(Through Study Completion 24 hours postoperative)
  • Blood loss,(Through Study Completion,an average of 1day)
  • Total dose of fentanyl required intraoperative (including induction dose)(Through study completion,an average of 1day)
  • Pain score at 15, 30, 45 and 60 min., 3,6,12 and 24 h after surgery(through study completion,an average of 1day)
  • Need for blood transfusion(Through Study Completion over the first 24 hours postoperative)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials