跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT02987309
NCT02987309终止不适用

Indirect Calorimetry: SensorMedics Vmax vs GE Carescape - a Method Comparison Study

Oslo University Hospital1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 6 人开始时间: 2017年3月30日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
终止
发起方
入组人数
6
试验地点
1
主要终点
MEE (measured energy expenditure) kcal/kg/day, RQ (respiratory quotient)

研究概览

简要总结

Dosing of nutrition in PICUs is mainly based on patient weight and assumptions on clinical status. There is however poor correlation between these calculations and actual energy consumption measured with indirect calorimetry (IC). Available equipment for IC has however been too cumbersome to use in daily clinical practice. Of relative new date is IC integrated in modern ventilators. This functionality is easy to use, but we do not know if the results are reliable for children. This study is a method comparison study comparing measurements done with SensorMedics Vmax ("gold standard") vs GE Carescape (modern ventilator with Integrated IC) in children undergoing intensive care treatment.

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
观察模型
Cohort
时间视角
Prospective

入排标准

年龄范围
— 至 18 Years(Child, Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • < 18 years of age,
  • endotracheally intubated.
  • FiO2 < 0,6, tube leak < 10%, tidal volume > 50 ml.

排除标准

  • Ventilatory and hemodynamically unstable during 2 hours prior to inclusion.

结局指标

主要结局

MEE (measured energy expenditure) kcal/kg/day, RQ (respiratory quotient)

时间窗: 2 hours

Comparison of measurements made by two different instruments

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

发起方
Oslo University Hospital
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Gunnar Bentsen

Principal Investigator

Oslo University Hospital

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验