Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT04634019
NCT04634019Active, not recruitingNot Applicable

Financially-Incentivized Knowledge Assessments to Improve Provider Compliance With Treatment Guidelines: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Swiss Tropical & Public Health Institute2 sites in 2 countries600 target enrollmentStarted: January 1, 2018Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Active, not recruiting
Enrollment
600
Locations
2
Primary Endpoint
Compliance with integrated management of childhood illness (IMCI) guidelines

Study Overview

Brief Summary

The main objective of this study is to assess whether making health financing streams conditional on provider performance on knowledge assessment can increase provider compliance with under-5 case management guidelines.

Detailed Description

The main idea of the intervention is to conduct quarterly provider knowledge assessments at health facilities and to pay facilities a bonus if providers perform well on these tests. For the intervention, 12 clinical vignettes were created. These vignettes cover typical patient cases such as malaria, diarrhea and respiratory infections, and assess providers' ability to correctly diagnose and treat hypothetical questions. All medical staff members were informed hat every 3 month there would be a knowledge assessment based on these vignettes and that the results would determine the total bonus payment made to the facility.

Each quarter, facilities receive a supervision visit. During the supervision visits, one provider is randomly chosen for the knowledge assessments, and is tested on two randomly chosen vignette cases.

In order to create a quarterly performance score, the scores on the two vignettes are then averaged. Fifty percent of the overall facility quality score is determined by the general quality checklist that captures basic structural and process features of the facility. The remaining fifty percent are directly determined by the providers' performance on the knowledge assessments. If the overall quality score is below 50%, no quality payments are made. If the quality score is >=50%, facilities can receive a top-up payment of up to 25% of the quantity-based payments. The total bonus percentage is determined by multiplying the quality score (with ranges between 0 and 100%) with the maximum 25% bonus.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Health Services Research
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Inclusion Criteria

  • •all providers working at the 110 facilities selected for the study will be included in the study.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Not provided

Arms & Interventions

Control arm

No Intervention

Providers in control facilities will not receive any additional training or knowledge assessments.

Financial incentive arm

Experimental

Providers in treatment facilities will be visited once a quarter for a knowledge assessment using vignettes. Facilities performing well in this assessment will receive a quarterly bonus payment, which will be distributed among providers.

Intervention: Financially incentivized knowledge assessments (Behavioral)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Compliance with integrated management of childhood illness (IMCI) guidelines

Time Frame: Endline (30 months after project start)

Compliance will be measured through up to 8 direct observations of under-5 sick child visits at each facility collected over a four-day period. During each visit, trained observes will document how many of the 10 diagnostic steps specified in the WHO's Integrated Management of Child Illness (IMCI) are followed by the provider. Compliance will be defined as least 8 out of 10 diagnostic processes completed.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Knowledge regarding IMCI guidelines(Endline (30 months after project start))

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Study Sites (2)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials