Comparison of the Effects of Three Warm-up Interventions at the Workplace on Pain, Heart Rate, Work Performance and Physical Capacities Among Vineyard Workers - a Protocol Study
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 发起方
- Opti'Mouv
- 入组人数
- 120
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Perceived pain intensity
研究概览
简要总结
Background:
Physical activity programs at the workplace have shown positive results on physical capacities and pain for several years. Due to the duration of the training session, the need of instructor, and the need of a place to practice, these programs are commonly complex to implement. For this reason, many of companies, especially companies in manual sectors are turning to another solution, i.e warm-up intervention before work shift. These interventions present on paper numerous advantages such as short duration, no need to specifically allocate a place in companies and the possibility to perform exercises in working clothes... Surprisingly, while positive effects of warm-up interventions on pain, performance physical and psychological capacities, are expansively reported in sport context, effects of workplace warm-up intervention are lacking. Therefore, the aims of this study are (1) to implement such intervention among vineyard-workers, workers highly exposed to heavy physical workload and pain and (2) to assess their effects on physical (pain, strength, flexibility) and psychological (workload) functions and also on work-related outcomes (work performance, readiness to work)
Methods:
A cluster randomized study will be implemented among French vineyard workers. Four groups of 30 participants will be constituted; corresponding to four different conditions: (1) hybrid warm-up intervention (HWU); (2) dynamic warm-up intervention (DWU); (3) stretching warm-up intervention (SWU); (4) no warm-up intervention (NWU). A total of 120 vineyard-workers will be recruited to participate in the study.
Discussion:
The results will provide more evidence about the short-term effects of warm-up interventions at the workplace, and will provide more evidence on which warm-up modality is the most effective on pain, performance, physical and psychological capacities among vineyard workers.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Prevention
- 盲法
- Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 60 Years（Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- •working full time
- •having at least 1 year of employment in the company
排除标准
- •not to present previous surgery in the low back region in the last 12 months
研究组 & 干预措施
Hybrid warm-up intervention
干预措施: Hybrid Warm-up (Other)
Dynamic warm-up intervention
干预措施: Dynamic Warm-up (Other)
Stretching warm-up intervention
干预措施: Stretching Warm-up (Other)
No warm-up intervention
结局指标
主要结局
Perceived pain intensity
时间窗: Pain intensity will be rated after three hour of work (Time 5)
Participants will be asked to rate their pain intensity over 15 anatomical locations using a 0-10 numerical rating scale (NRS), where 0 is used to indicate "no pain" while 10 indicate the "worst possible pain".
Work performance
时间窗: After three hours of work (Time 5)
number of grapevine pruned
Perceived pain intensity
时间窗: Pain intensity will be rated for the last 3 months
Participants will be asked to rate their pain intensity over 15 anatomical locations using a 0-10 numerical rating scale (NRS), where 0 is used to indicate "no pain" while 10 indicate the "worst possible pain".
Perceived pain intensity
时间窗: Pain intensity will be rated before the warm-up intervention (Time 0)
Participants will be asked to rate their pain intensity over 15 anatomical locations using a 0-10 numerical rating scale (NRS), where 0 is used to indicate "no pain" while 10 indicate the "worst possible pain".
Perceived pain intensity
时间窗: Pain intensity will be rated after the warm-up intervention (Time 1)
Participants will be asked to rate their pain intensity over 15 anatomical locations using a 0-10 numerical rating scale (NRS), where 0 is used to indicate "no pain" while 10 indicate the "worst possible pain".
Perceived pain intensity
时间窗: Pain intensity will be rated at the beginning of the working activity (Time 2)
Participants will be asked to rate their pain intensity over 15 anatomical locations using a 0-10 numerical rating scale (NRS), where 0 is used to indicate "no pain" while 10 indicate the "worst possible pain".
Perceived pain intensity
时间窗: Pain intensity will be rated after the first hour of work (Time 3)
Participants will be asked to rate their pain intensity over 15 anatomical locations using a 0-10 numerical rating scale (NRS), where 0 is used to indicate "no pain" while 10 indicate the "worst possible pain".
Perceived pain intensity
时间窗: Pain intensity will be rated after the second hour of work (Time 4)
Participants will be asked to rate their pain intensity over 15 anatomical locations using a 0-10 numerical rating scale (NRS), where 0 is used to indicate "no pain" while 10 indicate the "worst possible pain".
Work performance
时间窗: After one hour of work (Time 3)
number of grapevine pruned
Work performance
时间窗: After two hours of work (Time 4)
number of grapevine pruned
次要结局
- Handgrip Strength(After three hour of work (Time 5))
- Flexibility(After three hour of work (Time 5))
- Work quality(Time 5)
- Readiness to work(Time 2)
- Heart rate(Time 5)
- Workload(Time 5)
- Visuomotor reaction time(Time 5)
- Flexibility(After the warm-up intervention (Time 1))
- Heart rate(Time 0)
- Handgrip Strength(Before the warm-up intervention (Time 0))
- Handgrip Strength(After the warm-up intervention (Time 1))
- Flexibility(Before the warm-up intervention (Time 0))
- Heart rate(Time 1)
- Heart rate(Time 2)
- Heart rate(Time 3)
- Heart rate(Time 4)
- Readiness to work(Time 1)
- Visuomotor reaction time(Time 0)
- Visuomotor reaction time(Time 1)