A Study Of The Efficacy Of Gabapentin In Neuropathic Pain Patients As Measured By Quantitative Sensory Testing
Not Applicable
Completed
- Conditions
- NeuralgiaNeuralgia, Postherpetic
- Interventions
- Registration Number
- NCT00674687
- Lead Sponsor
- Pfizer's Upjohn has merged with Mylan to form Viatris Inc.
- Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to assess the reproducibility and the effect of gabapentin on quantitative sensory testing assessments in neuropathic pain subjects.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 23
Inclusion Criteria
- Neuropathic pain of peripheral origin as a consequence of either post-herpetic neuralgia or post-traumatic neuropathic pain
- Well-defined skin area of mechanical allodynia to punctate (von Frey filament) stimuli
- Pain intensity score of ≥ 4/10 for von Frey filament-evoked allodynia at the skin area
Exclusion Criteria
- Patients who have undergone neurolytic or neurosurgical therapy, including skin excisions, for neuropathic pain
- Patients who have trigeminal neuralgia, central pain, chronic radiculopathy, or peripheral neuropathy of non-mechanical or unknown origin
- Patients with any other co-existing pain which cannot be differentiated from the neuropathic pain of peripheral origin
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- CROSSOVER
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Sequence 2 1-week placebo then gabapentin - Sequence 1 2-weeks placebo then gabapentin -
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Presence/intensity of punctate allodynia (von Frey filament), measured on the pain numeric rating scale (NRS) Weeks 2 and 4
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Pain NRS score for temporal summation to dynamic brush allodynia (soft and coarse brush) Weeks 2 and 4 Subject assessed quality of evoked pain for temporal summation to dynamic brush allodynia (soft and coarse brush) Weeks 2 and 4 Pain NRS score for punctate allodynia Weeks 2 and 4 Test-day global pain scale Week 4 Pain NRS score for dynamic brush allodynia (soft brush) Weeks 2 and 4 Adverse events Throughout study duration Subject assessed quality of evoked pain for punctate allodynia Weeks 2 and 4 Pressure pain detection threshold Weeks 2 and 4 Area of punctate and dynamic (soft and coarse brush) allodynia Weeks 2 and 4 Subject assessed quality of evoked pain for temporal summation to punctate stimuli Weeks 2 and 4 Pressure pain tolerance threshold Weeks 2 and 4 Pain NRS scores for pressure pain Weeks 2 and 4 Pain NRS scores for temporal summation to punctate stimuli Weeks 2 and 4 Neuropathic pain scale Week 4 Pain diary card Week 4 Presence of metabonomic biomarkers Weeks 1 and 4 Subject assessed quality of evoked pain for dynamic brush allodynia (soft brush) Weeks 2 and 4 Tactile threshold Week 4 Physical examination 1 week after 4-week treatment period Clinical laboratory tests 1 week after 4-week treatment period Subject assessed quality of pressure pain Weeks 2 and 4
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
What molecular mechanisms underlie gabapentin's effect on neuropathic pain as measured by QST in NCT00674687?
How does gabapentin compare to standard-of-care treatments for postherpetic neuralgia in clinical trials?
Which biomarkers correlate with gabapentin response in neuropathic pain patients based on QST data?
What are the potential adverse events associated with gabapentin in PHN treatment and how are they managed?
How do gabapentinoids like pregabalin compare to gabapentin in PHN management using QST metrics?
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Pfizer Investigational Site
🇬🇧Liverpool, United Kingdom
Pfizer Investigational Site🇬🇧Liverpool, United Kingdom