Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT05265377
NCT05265377
Completed
Not Applicable

Safety and Usability of the STELO Exoskeleton in People With Acquired Brain Injury and Spinal Cord Injury

MarsiBionics3 sites in 1 country20 target enrollmentSeptember 21, 2022

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Spinal Cord Injury
Sponsor
MarsiBionics
Enrollment
20
Locations
3
Primary Endpoint
6 Minutes Walking Test (6MWT)
Status
Completed
Last Updated
2 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

Gait impairment in people with acquired brain injury (ABI) and spinal cord injury (SCI) can be very heterogeneous. For this reason, STELO has been developed: a new concept of exoskeleton based on modular technology for gait assistance. It allows a personalised configuration according to the functional capacity of each patient, as the therapist can choose which robotic joints to use depending on the therapeutic goal and on the patient recovery phase. The objective is to analyse the usability of the STELO modular exoskeleton in people with ABI and SCI.

Detailed Description

A test phase will be conducted in healthy volunteers as a proof of concept with the aim of evaluating safety and usability in healthy participants prior to the use of the device in the ABI or SCI population (Phase 2). After verifying that the device is safe in healthy people, phase 2 will begin: it consists of a total of 10 visits. These visits will include gait training sessions using the STELO modular exoskeleton.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
September 21, 2022
End Date
April 30, 2023
Last Updated
2 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Single Group
Sex
All

Investigators

Sponsor
MarsiBionics
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Weight \< 100 kg.
  • Height 150-190 cm.
  • Hip width between 30 - 45 cm.
  • Distance from hip joint centre to knee joint centre: 36 cm - 50 cm.
  • Distance from the centre of the knee joint to the ground: 43.5 - 59.5 cm.
  • Shoe size EU 36-
  • Patients must be able to follow simple commands.
  • Age 18-85 years.
  • Diagnosis of ABI or SCI.
  • FAC level in participants with ABI \<

Exclusion Criteria

  • Spasticity (MAS) = 4 in lower limbs.
  • Skin alterations in the areas of contact with the device.
  • Planned surgical intervention during the duration of the study.
  • Two or more osteoporotic fractures in the lower limbs in the last 2 years.
  • Presence of other pathologies causing exercise intolerance (such as uncontrolled hypertension, coronary artery disease, arrhythmia, congestive heart failure, severe pulmonary disease).
  • Surgical operation in the 3 months prior to the start of the study on the limbs and/or spine.
  • Psychiatric disorders that interfere with proper use of the device or participation in the study such as impulsivity or inability to understand simple commands.

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

6 Minutes Walking Test (6MWT)

Time Frame: In all sessions during 6 weeks.

Distance covered using the device in 6 minutes

Device malfunction

Time Frame: In all sessions during 6 weeks.

Number and type of device malfunction

Skin integrity

Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 100 days

Assess the size (centimetres) of the skin tag produced after use of the exoskeleton.

Kinematic gait analysis

Time Frame: Once during the first session.

Assessed by photogrammetry (VICON) in a gait analysis laboratory in healthy subjects

Functional Ambulation Categories

Time Frame: In all sessions during 6 weeks.

ABI participants

Physiotherapist's satisfaction (Therapist Satisfaction Scale)

Time Frame: At the end of the study, 6th week

It will be assessed using Therapist Satisfaction Scale

SF-12

Time Frame: At the end of the study, 6th week

Quality of life

Pain (Visual Analogic Scale)

Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 100 days

Pain registered before and after the use of the device, by the participant and therapist. The options are from 1 to 6. A higher score means a worse outcome. Pain registered before and after the use of the device, by the participant and therapist. The options are from 1 to 6. A higher score means a worse outcome.

Fall prevalence

Time Frame: During the use of the device, for 6 weeks.

Number of falling events ocurred from the participant or therapist.

10 Meters Walking Test (10MWT)

Time Frame: In all sessions during 6 weeks.

Time to cover 10 meters using the decvice.

Time and assistance with device attachment and removal

Time Frame: In all sessions during 6 weeks.

Time taken in minutes to fit and remove the participant's device.

Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury (WISCI)

Time Frame: In all sessions during 6 weeks.

SCI participants

User perception of the device (QUEST 2.0)

Time Frame: At the end of the study, 6th week

QUEST 2.0 will be assessed by the participant

Diastolic blood pressure

Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 100 days

Assesment of diastolic blood pressure in mmHg

Participant's satisfaction of the device (Participant Satisfaction scale).

Time Frame: At the end of the study, 6th week

It will be measured through Participant Satisfaction scale.

Heart rate

Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 100 days

Assessment of heart rate (beats/min)

Oxygen saturation

Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 100 days

% O2

Systolic blood pressure

Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 100 days

Assesment of systolic blood pressure in mmHg

Muscular activation

Time Frame: Once during the first session.

Assessed by electromyography (NORAXON).

Timed Up and Go (TUG)

Time Frame: In all sessions during 6 weeks.

Distance to go 3 metres, turn around and sit on a chair.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Accesssibility(At the end of the study, 6th week)
  • Acceptability(At the end of the study, 6th week)

Study Sites (3)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials