Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT02551666
NCT02551666
Completed
N/A

Balance Recovery Training for Fall Prevention in Retirement Communities

Texas A&M University0 sites35 target enrollmentSeptember 2015

Overview

Phase
N/A
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Accidental Falls, Aged, Exercise Movement Techniques
Sponsor
Texas A&M University
Enrollment
35
Primary Endpoint
Maximum Torso Angle at 0.8 Mph
Status
Completed
Last Updated
5 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

Falls are the leading cause of injuries and injury-related deaths among older adults over the age of 65 in the United States. To help reduce the number of these falls, there is growing interest in using reactive balance training to improve the reactive response to common perturbations (e.g., tripping and slipping). The goal of this study was to compare treadmill-based reactive balance training versus Tai Chi performed at, and among residents of, older adult senior housing. We hypothesized that participants randomized to reactive balance training (RBT) would show better performance on reactive balance tests compared to participants randomized to Tai Chi. We also hypothesized that participants randomized to Tai Chi would show better performance on clinical tests of balance and mobility compared to participants randomized to RBT. The long-term goal of this work is to demonstrate the value of RBT over Tai Chi for preventing falls resulting from sudden, external perturbations.

Thirty-five residents of five senior housing facilities were allocated to either treadmill-based reactive balance training or Tai Chi training. Both interventions were performed three times per week for four weeks, with each session lasting approximately 30 minutes. A battery of balance tests was performed at baseline, and again one week, one month, three months, and six months post-training. The battery included six standard clinical tests of balance and mobility, and a test of reactive balance performance.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
September 2015
End Date
May 2017
Last Updated
5 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Michael Madigan

Professor, Biomedical Engineering

Texas A&M University

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Must be age 70 or older
  • Must be a resident of local continuing care retirement community (CCRC)
  • Must be able to walk down a long hallway without any aids (cane, walker, etc.)
  • Must not have a fragility fracture in the past 10 years
  • Must not smoke
  • Must not be in physical therapy
  • Must not perform more than 150 minutes/week of moderate to vigorous aerobic activity
  • Must score 24 or higher on Folstein Mini Mental Status Exam
  • Must have less than 20% probability of major osteoporotic fracture as assessed by the fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX) score
  • Must not have recently (within 1 year) participated in Tai Chi

Exclusion Criteria

  • Not provided

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Maximum Torso Angle at 0.8 Mph

Time Frame: 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after completing four weeks of exercise intervention

maximum torso angle during a simulated trip, and be measures in degrees. Larger angles indicate worse performance.

Maximum Torso Angle at 1.6 Mph

Time Frame: 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after completing four weeks of exercise intervention

maximum torso angle during a simulated trip, and be measures in degrees. Larger angles indicate worse performance.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Timed-up-and-go Test(1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after completing four weeks of exercise intervention)
  • Berg Balance Test(1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after completing four weeks of exercise intervention)
  • Reactive Balance Rating(1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after completing four weeks of exercise intervention)
  • Step Length at 0.8 Mph(1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after completing four weeks of exercise intervention)
  • Unipedal Stance Time Test(1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after completing four weeks of exercise intervention)
  • Maximum Step Length Test(1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after completing four weeks of exercise intervention)
  • Performance-oriented Mobility Assessment (POMA)(1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after completing four weeks of exercise intervention)
  • Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale(1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after completing four weeks of exercise intervention)
  • Step Length at 1.6 Mph(1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after completing four weeks of exercise intervention)

Similar Trials