MedPath

Endobiliary Percutaneous Cryobiopsy in Malignant Biliary Obstruction

Not Applicable
Recruiting
Conditions
Biliary Obstruction
Biliary Tract Carcinoma
Interventions
Device: Cryobiopsy catheter
Registration Number
NCT06047990
Lead Sponsor
Brno University Hospital
Brief Summary

The rationale of the study is to explore the safety and efficacy of percutaneously performed endobiliary cryobiopsy in patiens with histologically unverified biliary stenosis.

Detailed Description

In patients with malignant biliary stenosis in whom endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERCP) is not feasible , percutaneous transhepatic drainage (PTD) is indicated. Biopsy is required for further management of the patient. In patients unsuitable for biopsy under CT or endoscopic guidance, samples can be collected endobiliary by PTD. The biopsy vie PTD can be sampled either at the initial drainage using disposable 5.2F forceps or delayed after 2 or more days using 7.5F endobiliary forceps. An alternative to this procedure is endobiliary sampling by cryobiopsy using 1.1mm, 1.7mm or 2.4mm catheters. To minimize bias, each patient will be sampled both by cryobiopsy and forceps biopsy. The order of cryobiopsy and forceps biopsy will be randomized.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
20
Inclusion Criteria
  • biliary stenosis of unknown etiology
  • unsuccessful or unfeasable ERCP
  • indicated percutaneous transhepatic drainage
Exclusion Criteria
  • histologically verified biliary stenosis
  • INR ≥ 1,5

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
CROSSOVER
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Forceps biopsyCryobiopsy catheterIn randomised patients in control arm was initially performed forceps biopsy (6 samples) with 5.2F or 7.5F forceps and cosequently cryobiopsy (3 samples). Both sampling techniques were performed during one procedure of percutaneous transhepatic drainage under fluoroscopic control.
CryobiopsyCryobiopsy catheterIn randomised patients in experimental arm was initially performed cryobiopsy (3 samples) and cosequently forceps biopsy (6 samples) with 5.2F or 7.5F forceps. Both sampling techniques were performed during one procedure of percutaneous transhepatic drainage under fluoroscopic control.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Quality of samples collected by endobiliary cryobiopsy and forceps biopsy - weightup to month 12 or death of the patient

Comparison of weight (in milligrams) of samples collected by endobiliary cryopsy and forceps biopsy. Each sample will be weighed separately and one measurement value will be recorded for each sample.

Sensitivity of biopsy sampling to detect malignancyup to month 12 or death of the patient

Comparison of sensitivity of endobiliary cryobiopsy and forceps biopsy for detection of malignancy.

Quality of samples collected by endobiliary cryobiopsy and forceps biopsy - sizeup to month 12 or death of the patient

Comparison of the size weight (in millimeters) of samples collected by endobiliary cryopsy and forceps biopsy. Each sample will be weighed in two dimensions on slide.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Brno University Hospital

🇨🇿

Brno, Czechia

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath