The Relative Effects of Three Parent-Intervention Components to Reduce Children's Anxiety
Not Applicable
Not yet recruiting
- Conditions
- Anxiety
- Interventions
- Behavioral: Component ABehavioral: Component BBehavioral: Component C
- Registration Number
- NCT05854602
- Lead Sponsor
- University of Amsterdam
- Brief Summary
This trial will test the relative effects of three parent-intervention components to reduce emerging anxiety problems in children aged 7-11. The components are: reducing family accommodation (Component A), increasing empathetic reactions to children's anxiety (Component B), and cognitive restructuring to reduce maladaptive parental thoughts about children's anxiety (Component C). The components were selected based on their distinct theoretical backgrounds and their frequent use in existing intervention programs. The investigators will use a full factorial experiment with all possible combinations and orders of components. The study period will be twelve weeks with five points of data-collection: T0 (baseline), T2 (two weeks post baseline, immediately after the first component), T4 (four weeks post baseline, immediately after the second component), T6 (six weeks post baseline, immediately after the third component) and T12 (12 weeks post baseline, follow-up).
Our overarching research questions are:
* How effective are Component A, B, and C in reducing children's anxiety symptoms? The effects of the components will be compared with each other, and with a control condition. This will be investigated both from T0 to T2 (i.e., effects of the individual components) and from T0 to T6 and T0 to T12 (i.e., effects of the components controlled for the presence of other components).
* How effective are the components in reducing children's life impairment? The effects of the components will be compared with each other, and with a control condition.
* Are effects of the components on children's anxiety mediated by changes in the parental risk factors that they target? (i.e., family accommodation for Component A, empathetic reactions for Component B, and parental maladaptive beliefs about child anxiety for Component C)
* Is there a dose-response effect such that children whose parents received more intervention components benefit more in terms of reduced anxiety symptoms in children?
* What parent, child, and intervention characteristics moderate the effects of the components on children's anxiety? In addition to basic sociodemographic information, the investigators will collect data on several putative moderators: the extent to which parents see their child as part of themselves (Inclusion of Child in the Self Scale), children's behavioural inhibition (Behavioural Inhibition Questionnaire), therapist alliance (Session Rating Scale), acceptability of the intervention (TEI-SF), other caregiver's use of the intervention components.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- NOT_YET_RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 266
Inclusion Criteria
- Child aged 7;0 - 11;11 years old
- Score of ≥ 4 on the screening questionnaire "Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale for Youth" (OASIS-Y; Comer et al., 2022) filled in by parents.
Exclusion Criteria
None
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- FACTORIAL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Condition 4: 0AB Component B This intervention condition received no intervention from baseline (T0) to the second measurement point two weeks later (T2), Component A from T2 to two weeks later (T4), and Component B from T4 to two weeks later (T6). Target n = 7. Condition 4: 0AB Component A This intervention condition received no intervention from baseline (T0) to the second measurement point two weeks later (T2), Component A from T2 to two weeks later (T4), and Component B from T4 to two weeks later (T6). Target n = 7. Condition 6: 0B0 Component B This intervention condition received no intervention from baseline (T0) to the second measurement point two weeks later (T2), Component B from T2 to two weeks later (T4), and no intervention from T4 to two weeks later (T6). Target n = 7. Condition 3: 00A Component A This intervention condition received no intervention from baseline (T0) to the second measurement point two weeks later (T2), no intervention from T2 to two weeks later (T4), and Component A from T4 to two weeks later (T6). Target n = 7. Condition 5: 0AC Component A This intervention condition received no intervention from baseline (T0) to the second measurement point two weeks later (T2), Component A from T2 to two weeks later (T4), and Component C from T4 to two weeks later (T6). Target n = 7. Condition 5: 0AC Component C This intervention condition received no intervention from baseline (T0) to the second measurement point two weeks later (T2), Component A from T2 to two weeks later (T4), and Component C from T4 to two weeks later (T6). Target n = 7. Condition 7: 00B Component B This intervention condition received no intervention from baseline (T0) to the second measurement point two weeks later (T2), no intervention from T2 to two weeks later (T4), and Component B from T4 to two weeks later (T6). Target n = 7. Condition 2: 0A0 Component A This intervention condition received no intervention from baseline (T0) to the second measurement point two weeks later (T2), Component A from T2 to two weeks later (T4), and no intervention from T4 to two weeks later (T6). Target n = 7. Condition 15: A0B Component B This intervention condition received Component A from baseline (T0) to the second measurement point two weeks later (T2), no intervention from T2 to two weeks later (T4), and Component B from T4 to two weeks later (T6). Target n = 7. Condition 17: AB0 Component A This intervention condition received Component A from baseline (T0) to the second measurement point two weeks later (T2), Component B from T2 to two weeks later (T4), and no intervention from T4 to two weeks later (T6). Target n = 7. Condition 10: 0C0 Component C This intervention condition received no intervention from baseline (T0) to the second measurement point two weeks later (T2), Component C from T2 to two weeks later (T4), and no intervention from T4 to two weeks later (T6). Target n = 7. Condition 19: AC0 Component A This intervention condition received Component A from baseline (T0) to the second measurement point two weeks later (T2), Component C from T2 to two weeks later (T4), and no intervention from T4 to two weeks later (T6). Target n = 7. Condition 20: ACB Component A This intervention condition received Component A from baseline (T0) to the second measurement point two weeks later (T2), Component C from T2 to two weeks later (T4), and Component B from T4 to two weeks later (T6). Target n = 7. Condition 9: 0BC Component B This intervention condition received no intervention from baseline (T0) to the second measurement point two weeks later (T2), Component B from T2 to two weeks later (T4), and Component C from T4 to two weeks later (T6). Target n = 7. Condition 12: 0CA Component A This intervention condition received no intervention from baseline (T0) to the second measurement point two weeks later (T2), Component C from T2 to two weeks later (T4), and Component A from T4 to two weeks later (T6). Target n = 7. Condition 15: A0B Component A This intervention condition received Component A from baseline (T0) to the second measurement point two weeks later (T2), no intervention from T2 to two weeks later (T4), and Component B from T4 to two weeks later (T6). Target n = 7. Condition 8: 0BA Component B This intervention condition received no intervention from baseline (T0) to the second measurement point two weeks later (T2), Component B from T2 to two weeks later (T4), and Component A from T4 to two weeks later (T6). Target n = 7. Condition 12: 0CA Component C This intervention condition received no intervention from baseline (T0) to the second measurement point two weeks later (T2), Component C from T2 to two weeks later (T4), and Component A from T4 to two weeks later (T6). Target n = 7. Condition 16: A0C Component A This intervention condition received Component A from baseline (T0) to the second measurement point two weeks later (T2), no intervention from T2 to two weeks later (T4), and Component C from T4 to two weeks later (T6). Target n = 7. Condition 16: A0C Component C This intervention condition received Component A from baseline (T0) to the second measurement point two weeks later (T2), no intervention from T2 to two weeks later (T4), and Component C from T4 to two weeks later (T6). Target n = 7. Condition 8: 0BA Component A This intervention condition received no intervention from baseline (T0) to the second measurement point two weeks later (T2), Component B from T2 to two weeks later (T4), and Component A from T4 to two weeks later (T6). Target n = 7. Condition 9: 0BC Component C This intervention condition received no intervention from baseline (T0) to the second measurement point two weeks later (T2), Component B from T2 to two weeks later (T4), and Component C from T4 to two weeks later (T6). Target n = 7. Condition 11: 00C Component C This intervention condition received no intervention from baseline (T0) to the second measurement point two weeks later (T2), no intervention from T2 to two weeks later (T4), and Component C from T4 to two weeks later (T6). Target n = 7. Condition 13: 0CB Component B This intervention condition received no intervention from baseline (T0) to the second measurement point two weeks later (T2), Component C from T2 to two weeks later (T4), and Component B from T4 to two weeks later (T6). Target n = 7. Condition 13: 0CB Component C This intervention condition received no intervention from baseline (T0) to the second measurement point two weeks later (T2), Component C from T2 to two weeks later (T4), and Component B from T4 to two weeks later (T6). Target n = 7. Condition 14: A00 Component A This intervention condition received Component A from baseline (T0) to the second measurement point two weeks later (T2), no intervention from T2 to two weeks later (T4), and no intervention from T4 to two weeks later (T6). Target n = 7. Condition 18: ABC Component A This intervention condition received Component A from baseline (T0) to the second measurement point two weeks later (T2), Component B from T2 to two weeks later (T4), and Component C from T4 to two weeks later (T6). Target n = 7. Condition 18: ABC Component C This intervention condition received Component A from baseline (T0) to the second measurement point two weeks later (T2), Component B from T2 to two weeks later (T4), and Component C from T4 to two weeks later (T6). Target n = 7. Condition 20: ACB Component B This intervention condition received Component A from baseline (T0) to the second measurement point two weeks later (T2), Component C from T2 to two weeks later (T4), and Component B from T4 to two weeks later (T6). Target n = 7. Condition 17: AB0 Component B This intervention condition received Component A from baseline (T0) to the second measurement point two weeks later (T2), Component B from T2 to two weeks later (T4), and no intervention from T4 to two weeks later (T6). Target n = 7. Condition 18: ABC Component B This intervention condition received Component A from baseline (T0) to the second measurement point two weeks later (T2), Component B from T2 to two weeks later (T4), and Component C from T4 to two weeks later (T6). Target n = 7. Condition 19: AC0 Component C This intervention condition received Component A from baseline (T0) to the second measurement point two weeks later (T2), Component C from T2 to two weeks later (T4), and no intervention from T4 to two weeks later (T6). Target n = 7. Condition 20: ACB Component C This intervention condition received Component A from baseline (T0) to the second measurement point two weeks later (T2), Component C from T2 to two weeks later (T4), and Component B from T4 to two weeks later (T6). Target n = 7. Condition 25: BAC Component B This intervention condition received Component B from baseline (T0) to the second measurement point two weeks later (T2), Component A from T2 to two weeks later (T4), and Component C from T4 to two weeks later (T6). Target n = 7. Condition 27: BCA Component A This intervention condition received Component B from baseline (T0) to the second measurement point two weeks later (T2), Component C from T2 to two weeks later (T4), and Component A from T4 to two weeks later (T6). Target n = 7. Condition 21: B00 Component B This intervention condition received Component B from baseline (T0) to the second measurement point two weeks later (T2), no intervention from T2 to two weeks later (T4), and no intervention from T4 to two weeks later (T6). Target n = 7. Condition 22: B0A Component B This intervention condition received Component B from baseline (T0) to the second measurement point two weeks later (T2), no intervention from T2 to two weeks later (T4), and Component A from T4 to two weeks later (T6). Target n = 7. Condition 23: B0C Component B This intervention condition received Component B from baseline (T0) to the second measurement point two weeks later (T2), no intervention from T2 to two weeks later (T4), and Component C from T4 to two weeks later (T6). Target n = 7. Condition 23: B0C Component C This intervention condition received Component B from baseline (T0) to the second measurement point two weeks later (T2), no intervention from T2 to two weeks later (T4), and Component C from T4 to two weeks later (T6). Target n = 7. Condition 24: BA0 Component A This intervention condition received Component B from baseline (T0) to the second measurement point two weeks later (T2), Component A from T2 to two weeks later (T4), and no intervention from T4 to two weeks later (T6). Target n = 7. Condition 22: B0A Component A This intervention condition received Component B from baseline (T0) to the second measurement point two weeks later (T2), no intervention from T2 to two weeks later (T4), and Component A from T4 to two weeks later (T6). Target n = 7. Condition 25: BAC Component C This intervention condition received Component B from baseline (T0) to the second measurement point two weeks later (T2), Component A from T2 to two weeks later (T4), and Component C from T4 to two weeks later (T6). Target n = 7. Condition 26: BC0 Component B This intervention condition received Component B from baseline (T0) to the second measurement point two weeks later (T2), Component C from T2 to two weeks later (T4), and no intervention from T4 to two weeks later (T6). Target n = 7. Condition 24: BA0 Component B This intervention condition received Component B from baseline (T0) to the second measurement point two weeks later (T2), Component A from T2 to two weeks later (T4), and no intervention from T4 to two weeks later (T6). Target n = 7. Condition 25: BAC Component A This intervention condition received Component B from baseline (T0) to the second measurement point two weeks later (T2), Component A from T2 to two weeks later (T4), and Component C from T4 to two weeks later (T6). Target n = 7. Condition 26: BC0 Component C This intervention condition received Component B from baseline (T0) to the second measurement point two weeks later (T2), Component C from T2 to two weeks later (T4), and no intervention from T4 to two weeks later (T6). Target n = 7. Condition 29: C0A Component A This intervention condition received Component C from baseline (T0) to the second measurement point two weeks later (T2), no intervention from T2 to two weeks later (T4), and Component A from T4 to two weeks later (T6). Target n = 7. Condition 34: CBA Component A This intervention condition received Component C from baseline (T0) to the second measurement point two weeks later (T2), Component B from T2 to two weeks later (T4), and Component A from T4 to two weeks later (T6). Target n = 7. Condition 27: BCA Component C This intervention condition received Component B from baseline (T0) to the second measurement point two weeks later (T2), Component C from T2 to two weeks later (T4), and Component A from T4 to two weeks later (T6). Target n = 7. Condition 29: C0A Component C This intervention condition received Component C from baseline (T0) to the second measurement point two weeks later (T2), no intervention from T2 to two weeks later (T4), and Component A from T4 to two weeks later (T6). Target n = 7. Condition 27: BCA Component B This intervention condition received Component B from baseline (T0) to the second measurement point two weeks later (T2), Component C from T2 to two weeks later (T4), and Component A from T4 to two weeks later (T6). Target n = 7. Condition 28: C00 Component C This intervention condition received Component C from baseline (T0) to the second measurement point two weeks later (T2), no intervention from T2 to two weeks later (T4), and no intervention from T4 to two weeks later (T6). Target n = 7. Condition 33: CB0 Component C This intervention condition received Component C from baseline (T0) to the second measurement point two weeks later (T2), Component B from T2 to two weeks later (T4), and no intervention from T4 to two weeks later (T6). Target n = 7. Condition 34: CBA Component B This intervention condition received Component C from baseline (T0) to the second measurement point two weeks later (T2), Component B from T2 to two weeks later (T4), and Component A from T4 to two weeks later (T6). Target n = 7. Condition 30: C0B Component B This intervention condition received Component C from baseline (T0) to the second measurement point two weeks later (T2), no intervention from T2 to two weeks later (T4), and Component B from T4 to two weeks later (T6). Target n = 7. Condition 30: C0B Component C This intervention condition received Component C from baseline (T0) to the second measurement point two weeks later (T2), no intervention from T2 to two weeks later (T4), and Component B from T4 to two weeks later (T6). Target n = 7. Condition 32: CAB Component A This intervention condition received Component C from baseline (T0) to the second measurement point two weeks later (T2), Component A from T2 to two weeks later (T4), and Component B from T4 to two weeks later (T6). Target n = 7. Condition 32: CAB Component C This intervention condition received Component C from baseline (T0) to the second measurement point two weeks later (T2), Component A from T2 to two weeks later (T4), and Component B from T4 to two weeks later (T6). Target n = 7. Condition 31: CA0 Component A This intervention condition received Component C from baseline (T0) to the second measurement point two weeks later (T2), Component A from T2 to two weeks later (T4), and no intervention from T4 to two weeks later (T6). Target n = 7. Condition 31: CA0 Component C This intervention condition received Component C from baseline (T0) to the second measurement point two weeks later (T2), Component A from T2 to two weeks later (T4), and no intervention from T4 to two weeks later (T6). Target n = 7. Condition 32: CAB Component B This intervention condition received Component C from baseline (T0) to the second measurement point two weeks later (T2), Component A from T2 to two weeks later (T4), and Component B from T4 to two weeks later (T6). Target n = 7. Condition 33: CB0 Component B This intervention condition received Component C from baseline (T0) to the second measurement point two weeks later (T2), Component B from T2 to two weeks later (T4), and no intervention from T4 to two weeks later (T6). Target n = 7. Condition 34: CBA Component C This intervention condition received Component C from baseline (T0) to the second measurement point two weeks later (T2), Component B from T2 to two weeks later (T4), and Component A from T4 to two weeks later (T6). Target n = 7.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Child Anxiety Twelve weeks after baseline (T12, follow-up) Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders-NL Parent-version (71 item version but we omitted OCD and PTSS scale and used the remaining 58 items). Higher scores indicate higher anxiety.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Child Life impairment Twelve weeks after baseline (T12, follow-up) Child Anxiety Life Interference Scale. Higher scores indicate more life interference.
Parental Empathetic Reactions to Child Anxiety Twelve weeks after baseline (T12, follow-up) Questionnaire loosely based on the Empathy Formative Questionnaire. Higher scores indicate more empathy.
Parental Cognitions about Child Anxiety Twelve weeks after baseline (T12, follow-up) Parental Beliefs About Anxiety Questionnaire. Higher scores indicate more maladaptive cognitions.
Family Accommodation Twelve weeks after baseline (T12, follow-up) Family Accommodation Scale - Anxiety. Higher scores indicate more family accommodation.