ASHA Bangladesh--An Integrated Intervention to Address Poverty and Depression
- Conditions
- Economic VulnerabilityDepression
- Registration Number
- NCT06295250
- Lead Sponsor
- University of Massachusetts, Worcester
- Brief Summary
The goal of this randomized controlled trial is to compare the impact of an integrated intervention combining poverty alleviation and depression treatment to depression treatment alone, in low income rural Bangladeshi women with depression. The main question\[s\] it aims to answer are whether adding poverty alleviation to depression treatment in an integrated intervention: 1) improves depression outcomes at 6 months post baseline as measured by changes in the PHQ-9 from baseline; 2) reduces the chance of relapse (PHQ-9 \>=10) at 24 months among patients who remitted (PHQ-9\>=5) at six months; and 2) whether adding poverty alleviation to depression treatment improves implementation outcomes including treatment uptake and retention. Participants in both arms will participate in research interviews at 6,12 and 24 months.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- Female
- Target Recruitment
- 660
- married women;
- age 18-75;
- fluent in Bengali);
- Meets criteria on an Economic Vulnerability Index
- >=10 on the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9 Depression Scale at baseline
- Inability to provide informed consent;
- Plans to travel for > 1 month during 24 M period.
- Inability to participate in the study for any other reason
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change in Depressive symptoms at 6 Months 6 Months Change in Symptoms from Baseline to 6 months post baseline, as measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire, a 9 item questionnaire designed to assess depressive symptoms. The minimum score is 0; the maximum score is 27.
24 Month Relapse 24 months Relapse is defined as a score of Patient Health Questionnaire\>= 10 among participants who achieved remission at Time 2--6 months. To assess relapse, at each data collection point (6, 12, and 24 month) the investigators will ask participants about the experience of depressive symptoms at any time since the previous data collection point. Data collection will focus on 24 month relapse, or the presence of relapse at any time since Time 2.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Anxiety Baseline, 6 Months, 12 Months, and 24 Months Anxiety symptoms as measured on the General Anxiety Disorder scale--a seven item questionnaire with scores from 0-231. HIgher scores indicate more anxiety.
Function Baseline, 6 Months, 12 Months, and 24 Months Function and disability as measured by the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule, a 12 item questionnaire that is scored from 12-60 with higher scores indicating greater disability.
Change in Quality of Life Baseline, 6 Months, 12 Months, and 24 Months Quality of life measure that includes five dimensions: mobility, self care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression, scored from 0-100 with higher scores indicating better quality of life.
Economic vulnerability index Baseline, 12, and 24 Months A composite index of economic vulnerability that includes income, assets, debt, food insecurity, financial worry. This measure does not have a fixed score but is composed using a pragmatic approach based on data collected in the field.
Tension Scale Baseline, 6 Months, 12 Months, 18 months and 24 Months A questionnaire that measures both psychological symptoms as well as somatic cultural symptoms: a 39 item instrument measured from 0-3 with a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 117. with higher scores indicating higher levels of distress.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research
🇧🇩Dhaka, Bangladesh
International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research🇧🇩Dhaka, BangladeshFahmida Tofail, MBBS, PhDContactftofail@icddrb.org