Routine Versus Symptomatic Protein Pump Inhibitor Therapy for Prevention of Gastroesophageal Reflux After Per Oral Endoscopic Myotomy for Esophageal Achalasia
- Conditions
- Esophageal Achalasia
- Interventions
- Drug: Protein pump inhibitor therapy systematically
- Registration Number
- NCT05899842
- Lead Sponsor
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes
- Brief Summary
Per Oral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM) is a treatment of choice for achalasia with an excellent safety and efficacy profile. There is a high rate of esophagitis related to gastroesophageal reflux following this procedure. There is no recommendation on the prescription of protein pump inhibitors (PPI) after the procedure and no study has studied the benefit of systematic prescription of PPI after POEM for achalasia. The study authors hypothesize that routine PPI prescribing post-POEM for 12 months would reduce the rate of esophageal acid exposure compared to a symptom-based prescribing strategy.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 132
- Patient with an indication for esophageal POEM for achalasia
- Patient with all types of achalasia with Eckardt score > 3
- The patient must have given their free and informed consent and signed the consent form
- The patient must be a member or beneficiary of a health insurance plan
- Patient with contraindications to PPIs
- Patient with mediastinal and esophageal neoplasia
- Patient with a history of Heller myotomy surgery
- Patients requiring any type of anti-reflux valve surgery
- The subject is in a period of exclusion determined by a previous study
- It is impossible to give the subject informed information
- The patient is under safeguard of justice or state guardianship
- Patient is pregnant, parturient or breastfeeding
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Systematic protein pump inhibitor therapy Protein pump inhibitor therapy systematically -
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Presence of pathological acid reflux between groups Month 6 According to the Lyon 2018 criteria: Esophagitis grade C or D according to the Los Angeles classification and/or acid exposure \>6% on 24-hour esophageal pH-metry
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Presence of pathological acid reflux between groups Month 12 According to the Lyon 2018 criteria: Esophagitis grade C or D according to the Los Angeles classification and/or acid exposure \>6% on 24-hour esophageal pH-metry
Patient quality of life between groups Month 12 WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire
Treatment tolerance between groups Month 12 Occurrence of adverse events as recorded by the doctor during patient interview using a scale of Grade 1 (minor) to Grade 5 (death)
Patient health-related quality of life between groups Month 12 Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Health Related Quality of Life scale (GERD-HRQL)
Quantity of PPI consumed between groups Month 12 Number of boxes of Lansoprazole consumed as recorded in PPI logbook
Achalasia symptoms between groups Month 12 Measured as Eckardt score \>3 (score ranging from 0 (no symptoms)-12 (maximum symptoms))
Pyrosis symptoms between groups Month 12 Classified according to Rome IV criteria: Acid Reflux, Esophageal Hypersensitivity, Functional Pyrosis, Normal
Trial Locations
- Locations (4)
CHU de Nîmes
🇫🇷Nîmes, France
Clinique mutualiste Beausoleil
🇫🇷Montpellier, France
AP-HM
🇫🇷Marseille, France
CHU de Montpellier
🇫🇷Montpellier, France