Comparison between marked versus unmarked introducer needle in real-time ultrasound-guided central vein cannulation-A prospective randomized study.
试验速览
- 阶段
- Phase 3 4
- 状态
- 招募中
- 入组人数
- 100
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- To evaluate and compare the effectiveness of marked versus unmarked introducer needle along with real time ultrasound guidance in central venous cannulation of critically ill patient.
研究概览
简要总结
Central venous cannulationis a part of essential care in critically ill patients. Ultrasound guidedcannulation is now the recommended practise in central venous cannulation. Butintroducer needle tip is not well visible during real time ultrasound. Thisleads to insertion difficulties, incorrect estimation and increase incomplications like arterial puncture and pneumothorax. This study was designedto evaluate whether real-time ultrasound-guided central vein cannulation with amarked introducer needle is superior to the unmarked introducer needle.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Computer generated randomization
- 盲法
- Investigator Blinded
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18.00 Year(s) 至 99.00 Year(s)（—）
- 性别
- All
入选标准
- •At the time of admission to CCM ICU adult (>18yrs) patients who require ultrasound guided central venous catheterization will be included in the study.
排除标准
- •â€¢Pediatric patients •Patient without consent.
结局指标
主要结局
To evaluate and compare the effectiveness of marked versus unmarked introducer needle along with real time ultrasound guidance in central venous cannulation of critically ill patient.
时间窗: During real time ultrasound guided central venous cannulation in critically ill patients.
次要结局
- To study the rate of complications of both the techniques.(NA)