Evaluation of Two Different Designs of Bausch & Lomb Contact Lenses
- Conditions
- Myopia
- Interventions
- Device: Redesigned Purevision Contact LensDevice: PureVision Contact Lens
- Registration Number
- NCT01118338
- Lead Sponsor
- Bausch & Lomb Incorporated
- Brief Summary
The objective of this one month study is to evaluate the product performance of a redesigned PureVision Contact Lens compared to the PureVision Contact Lens when worn on a daily wear basis by wearers of contact lenses.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 376
- Subjects must have clear central corneas and be free of any anterior segment disorders.
- Subjects must be adapted wearers of one of the listed contact lenses
- Subjects must be myopic
- Subjects must use a lens care system on a regular basis.
- Subjects who have worn gas permeable (GP) contact lenses within the last 30 days of polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) lenses within the last 3 months.
- Subjects with any systemic disease affecting ocular health.
- Subjects using any systemic or topical medications that will, in the Investigator's opinion, affect ocular physiology or lens performance.
- Subjects with an active ocular disease or are using any ocular medication.
- Subjects with any "Present" finding during the slit lamp examination that, in the Investigator's judgment, interferes with contact lens wear.
- Subjects who have had any corneal surgery (eg, refractive surgery).
- Subjects who have participated in any drug or device clinical investigation within two weeks prior to entry into this study and/or during the period of study participation.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Redesigned Purevision Contact Lens Redesigned Purevision Contact Lens Redesigned Bausch \& Lomb PureVision contact lens PureVision Contact Lens PureVision Contact Lens Bausch \& Lomb PureVision contact lens
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Symptoms and Complaints 1 month Symptoms/complaints were assessed on a scale from 0 to 100, with 0 denoting unfavorable symptoms/complaints and 100 denoting the most favorable rating. The generic scale was comprised of 14 separate questions, where each assessed the denoted symptom/complaint with a score between 0 and 100. The total score was not calculated.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Percentage of Eyes With > Grade 2 Slit Lamp Findings 1 month Graded slit lamp findings for each eye, including epithelial edema, epithelial microcysts, corneal staining, limbal and bulbar injections, upper lid tarsal conjunctival abnormalities, corneal neovascularization, and corneal infiltrates were graded for severity on a scale from 0 (No Finding) to 4 (Severe Finding). The outcome measure is any finding \> grade 2, across abnormalities.
Visual Acuity 1 month Visual acuity was assessed by distance high contrast logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR).
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Bausch & Lomb
🇺🇸Rochester, New York, United States