Endocuff Vision Colonoscopy vs. AmplifEYE Colonoscopy
- Conditions
- Colorectal AdenomaColorectal PolypColorectal Cancer
- Interventions
- Device: AmplifEYE deviceDevice: Endocuff Vision device
- Registration Number
- NCT03560128
- Lead Sponsor
- Indiana University
- Brief Summary
The study aims to compare the results between colonoscopies with two different attachments on the distal end of the colonoscope.
- Detailed Description
This will be a prospective, randomized controlled study. Subjects referred for a screening, surveillance, or diagnostic colonoscopy will be prospectively enrolled. This study aims to compare the number of adenomas detected per colonoscopy (APC) between an Endocuff colonoscopy and an AmplifEYE colonoscopy.
It is estimated that the Endocuff Vision will result in an APC of 2.3. The investigators consider that a clinically acceptable ADR for the Medivators device would be within 20% of this value or 1.5.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 634
- 40 years of age or older
- Undergoing colonoscopy for screening, surveillance, or diagnostic purposes
- Able to provide written informed consent
- Active Inflammatory Bowel Disease
- Prior resection of the colon
- Referred for resection of a polyp identified by another physician
- Referred for a previous incomplete colonoscopy
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description AmplifEYE Arm AmplifEYE device Colonoscopy with AmplifEYE device attached to the distal end of the scope. Endocuff Vision Arm Endocuff Vision device Colonoscopy with Endocuff Vision device attached to the distal end of the scope.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Number of Adenomas Detected Per Colonoscopy (APC). During colonoscopy procedure Comparison of the number of adenomas detected per colonoscopy between the Endocuff Vision Colonoscopy and the AmplifEYE colonoscopy.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Detection Rates (Adenoma Detection Rate (ADR) and Polyp Detection Rate (PDR)) During colonoscopy procedure Comparison of the number of participants with at least one adenoma detected (ADR) between AmplifEYE colonoscopy and the Endocuff Vision colonoscopy.
Comparison of the number of participants with at least one polyp detected (PDR) between AmplifEYE colonoscopy and the Endocuff Vision colonoscopy.Complications Encountered During Procedure During Colonoscopy procedure Comparison of amount of mucosal trauma (such as scratches), perforation (making a hole in the colon wall), or gastrointestinal bleeding between patients that have AmplifEYE colonoscopy compared to patients that have Endocuff Vision colonoscopy.
Passage of Device Through Sigmoid Colon during insertion portion of colonoscopy Comparison of the number of times the device had to be removed to pass the sigmoid colon between colonoscopies with the AmplifEYE device and colonoscopies with the Endocuff Vision device.
Polyps Per Colonoscopy (PPC) During colonoscopy procedure Comparison of the number of polyps detected per colonoscopy between the Endocuff Vision Colonoscopy and the AmplifEYE colonoscopy.
Time Comparison for Each Method During colonoscopy procedure Comparison of the insertion time, overall withdrawal time, inspection time, and total procedure time between the AmplifEYE colonoscopy and the Endocuff Vision colonoscopy.
Insertion time: time it takes from the colonoscope first being inserted to when the cecum is reached Withdrawal time: time calculated from when withdrawing is started in the cecum until the colonoscope is removed. This includes time spent washing, suctioning, inspecting the colon, and removing polyps.
Inspection time: time spent actually examining the colon and does not include time spent for washing the colon, suctioning, and removing polyps.
Total procedure time: time from the initial insertion of the colonoscope through the complete withdrawal of the colonoscope.Cecal Intubation Rate During Colonoscopy procedure Comparison of the number of procedures where the colonoscope was able to reach the cecum between AmplifEYE colonoscopy and Endocuff Vision colonoscopy.
Detection of Serrated Lesions During colonoscopy procedure Comparison of the number of participants with at least one Sessile Serrated Polyp detected (SSPDR) between AmplifEYE colonoscopy and the Endocuff Vision colonoscopy.
Comparison of the number of participants with at least one flat polyp detected between AmplifEYE colonoscopy and the Endocuff Vision colonoscopy.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Indiana University
🇺🇸Indianapolis, Indiana, United States