MedPath

Study Evaluating Tigecycline Versus Imipenem/Cilastatin in Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia

Phase 3
Completed
Conditions
Bacterial Pneumonia
Registration Number
NCT00080496
Lead Sponsor
Wyeth is now a wholly owned subsidiary of Pfizer
Brief Summary

To compare the efficacy and safety of the tigecycline regimen with that of the imipenem/cilastatin regimen in subjects with nosocomial pneumonia.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
430
Inclusion Criteria
  • Male or female subjects over 18 years of age. Bulgaria Only: Male or female subjects over 18 years of age and under 70 years of age.
  • Subjects known or suspected to have acute hospital-acquired pneumonia.
Exclusion Criteria
  • Presence of any of the following pulmonary conditions: cystic fibrosis; pulmonary malignancy (either primary or metastatic); known bronchial-obstructive or post obstructive pneumonia; pulmonary abscess; empyema; known or suspected active tuberculosis; bronchiectasis; sarcoidosis; known or suspected pulmonary infection caused by Pneumocystis carinii, mycobacteria, fungi, parasites, or viruses (Subjects with COPD are not excluded)
  • Suspected or known Legionella infection
  • Concurrent hemodialysis, hemofiltration, peritoneal dialysis, or plasmapheresis

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
The co-primary efficacy endpoints are clinical response at the TOC assessment for the clinically evaluable population and the clinical modified intent-to-treat population.
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath