跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT00872612
NCT00872612已完成3 期

Endosonography (EUS and EBUS) vs Conventional Bronchoscopy for the Diagnosis of Sarcoidosis: a Randomized Trial

Leiden University Medical Center15 个研究点 分布在 6 个国家目标入组 304 人开始时间: 2009年3月1日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
3 期
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
304
试验地点
15
主要终点
The role of endosonography (EBUS/ EUS - FNA) in demonstrating non-caseating granulomas in comparison with conventional bronchoscopy (TBLB + EBB)

研究概览

简要总结

This randomized study investigates two different diagnostic strategies for patients with suspected pulmonary sarcoidosis stage I/II.

The objective is to assess the role of endosonography (EBUS/ EUS - FNA) in demonstrating non-caseating granulomas in comparison with conventional bronchoscopy (TBLB + EBB).

Also the researchers investigate the additional value of BAL, in relation to endosonography and conventional bronchoscopy (TBLB + EBB), in diagnosing sarcoidosis.

Thirdly the researchers aim to assess the rate of complications in both the endosonography and conventional bronchoscopic workup.

详细描述

Sarcoidosis is the most prevalent interstitial lung disease in Western-Europe and the US. The disease is most prevalent in young adults. To set the final diagnosis of sarcoidosis, the following parameters need to be present:

  1. A clinical and radiological suspicion of sarcoidosis stage I/II.
  2. A tissue diagnosis of disease-specific non-caseating granulomas.
  3. Exclusion of possible alternative diagnoses as lung cancer or tuberculosis.

Nowadays, a bronchoscopy with lung biopsies is advised to set a tissue diagnosis of sarcoidosis. However, these biopsies are only diagnostic in 70% of the procedures and they are associated with a 3% risk of coughing up blood and a 4% risk of a lung collapse.

Since recently, a new diagnostic procedure has come available. This procedure, endo-sonography, makes it possible to biopsy lymph nodes in the chest under direct visualization and has a diagnostic accuracy of 85%. The associated risk of complications appears to be small (<1%)

We consider the current standard for the diagnostics of sarcoidosis to be outdated, considering the clinical availability of endo-sonography. We expect that endo-sonography is more frequent diagnostic for a tissue diagnosis of sarcoidosis.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Diagnostic
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者
否

入选标准

  • •Patients with suspected pulmonary sarcoidosis stage I/ II
  • •Age > 18 years
  • •Both males and females
  • •Written informed consent is obtained.

排除标准

  • •Patients with obvious other organ involvement of sarcoidosis where a simple diagnostic biopsy to assess granulomas can be performed.
  • •Löfgren's syndrome
  • •Inability to undergo fiberbronchoscopy, EBUS or EUS (e.g. respiratory insufficiency, esophageal stenosis
  • •Contraindications for a lung or nodal biopsy (e.g. coagulopathy, thrombocytopenia)
  • •Pregnancy
  • •Inability to obtain informed consent

研究组 & 干预措施

A

Experimental

Endosonography arm

干预措施: EUS-FNA/EBUS-TBNA + BAL (Procedure)

B

Active Comparator

Conventional bronchoscopy arm

干预措施: EBB + TBLB + BAL (Procedure)

结局指标

主要结局

The role of endosonography (EBUS/ EUS - FNA) in demonstrating non-caseating granulomas in comparison with conventional bronchoscopy (TBLB + EBB)

时间窗: within a week

次要结局

  • The additional value of BAL, in relation to endosonography and conventional bronchoscopy (TBLB + EBB), in diagnosing sarcoidosis(2 weeks)
  • Assessment of complications of both the endosonography and conventional bronchoscopic workup(within 30 days)
  • Assessment of patient preference for both the endosonographic and conventional bronchoscopic work-up.(within a week)

研究者

发起方
Leiden University Medical Center
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

M.B. von Bartheld

MB von Bartheld, MSc. PhD Student

Leiden University Medical Center

研究点 (15)

Loading locations...

相似试验