CPT for Offenders With SUD
- Conditions
- Computer-assisted, Evidence-based Psychosocial Interventionfor Substance Abuse Treatment
- Interventions
- Behavioral: Therapeutic Education System (TES)Behavioral: Standard Care
- Registration Number
- NCT01277939
- Lead Sponsor
- National Development and Research Institutes, Inc.
- Brief Summary
This study will evaluate the comparative effectiveness of Therapeutic Education System (TES), a computer-based, psychosocial treatment program, relative to standard care when offered to individuals with substance use disorders in prison settings. The study will assess the comparative effectiveness of these interventions primarily by examining changes in: (1) substance use (e.g., weeks of abstinence), (2) HIV risk behavior (evaluated as both sex-related and drug-related HIV risk behavior) and (3) reincarceration rates. The study will also examine the extent to which these interventions improve psychosocial functioning (e.g., employment, health, and psychological status) and quality of life, and promote relevant skills acquisition (e.g., improve communication skills, reduce "criminal thinking"). The investigators predict significantly better outcomes for E vs. C due to TES' research-based content and use of proven informational technologies.
- Detailed Description
The majority of individuals in criminal justice settings across the U.S. have a critical need for science-based, psychosocial treatment that targets substance use and HIV risk behavior. The investigative team has developed and demonstrated the efficacy of an interactive, computer-based, psychosocial treatment pro-gram, the Therapeutic Education System (TES), which can answer this need. TES is theoretically grounded in evidence-based psychosocial treatments (Community Reinforcement Approach and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy), and employs state-of-the-art, proven informational technologies and multimedia learning tools to promote skills acquisition, experiential learning and behavioral change. This computer-based therapeutic tool allows complex interventions to be delivered with fidelity to the evidence-based model and at low cost due to its self-directed nature (e.g., minimal staff time/training needed), thus offering considerable potential for future sustainability and dissemination within criminal justice systems.
The study employs random assignment of incarcerated male and female offenders with substance use disorders (N=526) to either (1) TES (N=263), or (2) Standard Care (N=263), in a multi-site trial conducted in 8 prison substance abuse programs. Along with NDRI (the applicant organization), the collaborating study sites (University of California Los Angeles, Temple University, and the University of Kentucky) operate Research Centers that belong to the Criminal Justice Drug Abuse Treatment Studies (CJDATS) network, a NIDA-funded cooperative agreement, which has established relationships with criminal justice partners from Departments of Corrections across the U.S. Aim 1 is to test the comparative effectiveness of TES vs. Standard Care on measures of drug use (e.g., weeks of abstinence) and HIV risk behavior (both sex-related and drug-related HIV risk behavior) at 3- and 6-months post prison discharge, as well as on reincarceration rates using official Department of Corrections records. Aim 2 is to evaluate the cost and cost-effectiveness of TES relative to standard care. The investigators predict that TES will be significantly more effective and cost effective than Standard Care.
The project is significant in its use of an innovative, computer-based technology and in its potential to produce a major increase in the effective and cost-effective delivery of science-based psychosocial treatment to substance-abusing offenders in prison, and thereby make a considerable public health contribution. Thus, funding the proposed 2-year project can markedly accelerate the pace and achievement of research and dissemination efforts to meet the needs of the U.S. correctional community by providing effective and practical treatment interventions for its large substance-abusing population.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 376
- individual's parole eligibility date or mandatory release date must be scheduled to occur within a minimum of 4 months (to allow intake an treatment to be completed) and a maximum of 6 months (to ensure that their release follows completion of their treatment such that sufficient time remains for post-prison follow-up interviews to occur within the two-year project timeframe)
- the state criminal justice system must have identified the individual to have a substance use disorder that requires a substance abuse intervention
- the individual must give their informed consent
- the individual must not already be participating in substance abuse treatment
- the individual must speak English, as TES is now only available in English
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Therapeutic Education System (TES) Therapeutic Education System (TES) Experimental (E) condition, the Therapeutic Education System (TES) delivered via effective informational technologies and multimedia learning tools. Standard Care Standard Care The Control (C) condition, Standard Care, consisting of psycho-educational and psycho-social approaches to substance use disorders (commonly offered in prison settings) delivered by counselors in group formats.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Time Line Follow Back for Drug and Alcohol Use (Sobell et al., 1996) 6 months post-prison release Measure for substance use.
Urinalysis 6 months post-prison release To detect any change in illicit drug use.
Risk Behavior Survey (Booth et al., 1993) 6 months post-prison release To assess both drug-related and sex-related HIV risk behavior.
DOC record systems At an average of 11 months post-prison release To provide the reincarceration status of each participant.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Coping Strategies Scale 6 months post-prison release Measures skills acquisition, such as problem solving and dealing with urges to use substances of abuse (Litt et al., 2005), and psychosocial functioning
Addiction Severity Index-Lite 6 months post-prison release Measures areas of health status improvement, psychological status, family/social relationships, and employment. (www.tresearch.org)
The Treatment Services Review instrument (McLellan et al., www.tresearch.org) 6 months post-prison release Used to investigate the role of treatment services received post-release (in aftercare).
Brief Drug Abuse Treatment Cost Analysis Program (BriefDATCAP) 6 months post-prison release Measures for the cost effectiveness analyses.
EuroQol EQ5D (QOL) (the EuroQol Group, 1990) 6 months post-prison release Describes and value health-related quality of life and for constructing Quality-Adjusted Life Year estimates (QALYs).
Trial Locations
- Locations (10)
Denver Women's Correctional Facility
🇺🇸Denver, Colorado, United States
Colorado Territorial Correctional Facility
🇺🇸Canon City, Colorado, United States
La Vista Correctional Facility
🇺🇸Pueblo, Colorado, United States
Airway Heights Corrections Center
🇺🇸Airway Heights, Washington, United States
Four Mile Correctional Center
🇺🇸Canon City, Colorado, United States
SCI Cambridge Springs
🇺🇸Cambridge Springs, Pennsylvania, United States
Fremont Correctional Facility
🇺🇸Canon City, Colorado, United States
Trinidad Correctional Facility
🇺🇸Model, Colorado, United States
Sterling Correctional Facility
🇺🇸Sterling, Colorado, United States
Blackburn Correctional Complex
🇺🇸Lexington, Kentucky, United States