跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04136314
NCT04136314已完成不适用

The Effects of Gain- Versus Loss-Framed Messages on Patient Preferences for Therapies in Individuals With Psoriasis

University of Southern California2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 90 人开始时间: 2019年10月21日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
90
试验地点
2
主要终点
Gain-framed vs. Loss-framed Survey Responses

研究概览

简要总结

Rationale:

Shared decision-making models between clinicians and patients are critical to improving healthcare delivery and adherence to medication. One type of model, decision framing, is rarely studied in medicine. Decision framing is the way that a choice is worded. In a clinical context, patient choices can be worded positively, or "gain-framed", to explain the benefits of a therapy or negatively, or "loss-framed", to explain the risks of not taking a therapy. Previous literature suggests that decision-framing can significantly influence patients' decision-making regarding their healthcare. However, a critical gap exists in understanding how decision framing affects psoriasis patients' preferences for therapies.

Objective:

Determine whether loss-framed messages lead to greater therapy acceptance as compared to gain-framed messages among adults with psoriasis.

Study population:

90 adults with psoriasis will be enrolled from USC ambulatory clinics and the general public.

Intervention:

Subjects will be exposed to gain-framed or loss-framed messages regarding psoriasis therapies. Specifically, gain-framed messages will explain the expected benefits of taking the psoriasis therapy and loss-framed messages will explain the potential risks of not taking the psoriasis therapy.

Study Methodology:

Cross-sectional single-intervention survey.

详细描述

Study Design:

The investigators will conduct a single intervention cross-sectional study to evaluate the impact of gain-framing versus loss-framing on patients' therapy preferences. This pragmatic study will compare whether patients are more likely to adhere to a hypothetical injectable psoriasis medication after exposure to a short paragraph explaining either the potential benefits after receiving the medication or the potential losses of not receiving the medication. The goal of this pragmatic study is to test whether differences arise in patient preferences depending on how the information they receive is framed.

Recruitment:

The investigators will recruit ninety adults with psoriasis from the Keck Medicine of University of Southern California (USC) Outpatient Care Network and the Los Angeles County+University of Southern California (LAC+USC) Medical Center outpatient clinic network.

Survey Administration:

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Single Group
主要目的
Health Services Research
盲法
Single (Investigator)

盲法说明

Primary/blinded investigator will be blinded to randomization of subject to either group A (gain-framed) or group B (loss-framed) arms. Blinded party will create the randomization master list and provide a given subject's arm allocation to the primary/unblinded investigator once that subject has been enrolled.

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Greater than 18 years of age
  • Has physician diagnosed psoriasis with or without psoriatic arthritis
  • Able to read and write in either English or Spanish

排除标准

  • Less than 18 years of age
  • Does not have physician diagnosed psoriasis
  • Unable to read and respond to questionnaires in English or Spanish

结局指标

主要结局

Gain-framed vs. Loss-framed Survey Responses

时间窗: Up to 14 weeks

Difference in survey responses based on exposure to gain-frame or loss-frame question. After exposure to the positively or negatively framed question, subjects will be asked how likely they would agree to receive a hypothetical injectable medication. The subjects will answer with a Likert scale ranging from 0 to 10, with 0 indicating they will definitely not want the medication and 10 indicating they will definitely want the medication. Each enrolled subject will complete the survey only once.

次要结局

  • Effect of Psoriatic Arthritis on Survey Responses(Up to 14 weeks)
  • Effect of Sex on Survey Responses(Up to 14 weeks)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

April Armstrong

Principal Investigator

University of Southern California

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验