跳至主要内容
临床试验/CTRI/2024/09/074305
CTRI/2024/09/074305尚未招募3 期

Comparison of short axis-angle distance approach versus long axis in-plane approach of ultrasound guided radial artery cannulation: A Randomized Controlled Trial

All India Institute of Medical Sciences New Delhi1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 72 人开始时间: 2024年10月5日最近更新:

试验速览

阶段
3 期
状态
尚未招募
发起方
入组人数
72
试验地点
1
主要终点
First attempt success rate of ultrasound

研究概览

简要总结

Arterial cannulation is a frequently performed procedure in patients with anticipated massive blood loss, significant hemodynamic changes or requirement of frequent blood gas sampling in perioperative period. Various arteries are being used for cannulation like radial, ulnar, femoral and dorsalis pedis. The radial artery cannulation can be done by visualizing the artery in oblique axis, long axis and transverse axis via ultrasound. Each technique has different degree of success rate. However, the optimal USG guided technique is still controversial as the results are variable. Till now there are various studies done regarding long axis approach for USG guided radial artery cannulation. There is another variation of short-axis angle distance technique which has been compared with DNTP technique. To the best of our knowledge, there are no studies that compared  short axis- angle distance with long axis technique. So, we want to compare short axis-angle distance approach with long axis-in plane approach.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
盲法
Participant and Outcome Assessor Blinded

入排标准

年龄范围
18.00 Year(s) 至 99.00 Year(s)(—)
性别
All

入选标准

  • ASA 1,2 or 3 patients posted for elective or emergency surgeries requiring radial artery cannulation.

排除标准

  • Patient refusal Abnormal Modified Allen test BMI more than 30kg per cm2 Local infection at site of cannulation Patients with any other contraindication for radial artery cannulation.

结局指标

主要结局

First attempt success rate of ultrasound

时间窗: At Baseline.

guided radial artery cannulation using short axis-angle distance technique vs long axis in plane technique.

时间窗: At Baseline.

次要结局

  • 1. Overall success rate(2. Total number of attempts)

研究者

发起方
All India Institute of Medical Sciences New Delhi
申办方类型
Government medical college
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Dr. Rishi Sharma

All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delh

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验