Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT05730426
NCT05730426CompletedNot Applicable

Deep Dry Needling Versus Muscle Energy Technique on Chronic Non-specific Neck Pain; a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Cairo University1 site in 1 country66 target enrollmentStarted: August 1, 2022Last updated:
Conditions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Enrollment
66
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Change in function from baseline to 4 weeks after.

Study Overview

Brief Summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare between applying deep dry needling and muscle energy technique in chronic non-specific neck pain patients. Researchers will compare between deep dry needling group, muscle energy technique group and control group to see if there are change in pain, range of motion or function.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to 40 Years (Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • Age 18 and 40 years.
  • Current neck pain.
  • Presence of at least one or two trigger points .
  • Patients are diagnosed and referred from orthopedist complaining from chronic neck pain for at least 12 weeks.
  • No clinical treatment for neck pain within the past month.
  • lacked a history of neck and shoulder myopathy, neuropathy, myelopathy and neck, torso and shoulder surgery.
  • Patients with body mass index less than 30 kg/m2.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Patients outside the target range.
  • Neck pain associated with vertigo.
  • Osteoporosis.
  • Diagnosed psychological disorders.
  • Fibromyalgia syndrome.
  • Vertebral fractures.
  • Spinal stenosis.
  • Previous neck surgery.
  • Red flags (night pain, severe muscle spasm, loss of involuntary weight, symptom mismatch).
  • Physiotherapeutic treatment continued in the last 3 months. Any contraindications for deep dry needling such as anticoagulants, infections and bleeding.

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Change in function from baseline to 4 weeks after.

Time Frame: at baseline and after 4 weeks from the baseline.

The Neck Disability Index (NDI) The NDI questionnaire (scored out of 50) was used to measure the patient's perceived disability resulting from their neck pain. The score for each section was from 0 to 5, with 0 represented the highest level of function and 5 represented the lowest level of function. Total NDI scores were shown as a percentage. A high score corresponded to a higher degree of disability. * 0-4points (0-8%) no disability. * 5-14points (10 - 28%) mild disability. * 15-24points (30-48%) moderate disability. * 25-34points (50- 64%) severe disability. * 35-50points (70-100%) complete disability.

Change in cervical range of motion (ROM) in sagittal, coronal and transverse planes from baseline to 4 weeks after.

Time Frame: at baseline and after 4 weeks from the baseline.

AcuAngle® Inclinometer: (Baseline® AcuAngle Inclinometer; Elmsford, NY, U.S. PAT 2194335, 2-D Functions)

Change in pain threshold from baseline to 4 weeks after.

Time Frame: at baseline and after 4 weeks from the baseline.

Pain Pressure Algometer: (BASELINE 22-POUND DOLORIMETER).

Change in pain intensity from baseline to 4 weeks after.

Time Frame: at baseline and after 4 weeks from the baseline.

Visual Analogue scale (VAS) * A value of 0 denotes no pain, whereas a value of 1 to 3 indicates mild pain. * 4 to 6 denotes moderate pain. * 7 to 10 denotes intense pain.

Secondary Outcomes

No secondary outcomes reported

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Haneen Mohamed Abo El-enen Ghalwash

Teaching assisstat

Delta University for Science and Technology

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials