Phase 2 Nab® -Paclitaxel (Abraxane®) Plus Gemcitabine in Subjects With Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer (LAPC)
- Conditions
- Pancreatic Neoplasms
- Interventions
- Registration Number
- NCT02301143
- Lead Sponsor
- Celgene
- Brief Summary
This clinical study is in subjects who are 18 years old or older with locally advanced pancreatic cancer who have not received prior treatment for their pancreatic cancer. The study treats all subjects with nab-Paclitaxel plus gemcitabine for approximately 6 months of treatment. Subjects who complete the treatment will choose, with their treating physicians, what additional treatment should be given: more nab-Paclitaxel plus gemcitabine, Chemoradiation therapy, or surgery to treat the locally advanced pancreatic cancer.
- Detailed Description
This is an international, non-randomized, open-label, multi-center, Phase 2 study in subjects who are 18 years old or older with locally advanced pancreatic cancer who have not received prior treatment for their pancreatic cancer. All subjects will be treated with nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine for 6 cycles followed by an Investigator's Choice of continuation of treatment with nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine, chemoradiation therapy, or surgery.
Safety assessments by laboratory testing and physical exams will be conducted through-out the study.
Efficacy assessments by physical exam will be preformed through-out the study and tumor imaging will be conducted approximately every 2 months.
Subjects will be considered active study participants from enrollment up to, but not including, survival follow-up period.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 107
-
Non- metastasis, unresectable, adenocarcinoma pancreatic cancer patients
-
No prior anticancer therapy for pancreatic cancer
•≥ 18 years of age with a performance status of 0 or 1•Adequate complete blood counts, hepatic function, and renal function
-
Signed informed Consent
- Active bacterial, viral, or fungal infection
- Infection with hepatitis B or C, or history of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, or receiving immunosuppressive or myelosuppressive
- Subjects with sensory neuropathy, ascites, or plastic biliary stent.
- Serious medical risk factors involving any of the major organ systems, or serious psychiatric disorders (including but not limited to connective tissue disorders, lung disease, and cardiac or seizure disorders)
- Women who are pregnant or breast feeding
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- SINGLE_GROUP
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description nab-Paclitaxel plus Gemcitabine Chemoradiation nab-Paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 intravenous (IV) infusion over approximately 30 to 45 minutes on Days 1, 8, and 15, followed by gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 IV infusion over approximately 30 minutes on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 28-day cycle Subjects who complete 6 cycles of nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine without disease progression or unacceptable toxicities, the Investigator will then determine the best option for the subject. * Continuation of nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine therapy to disease progression or unacceptable toxicity OR * Chemoradiation therapy consisting of the concurrent use of capecitabine or gemcitabine with radiation according to institutional practice OR * Surgical intervention nab-Paclitaxel plus Gemcitabine Surgery nab-Paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 intravenous (IV) infusion over approximately 30 to 45 minutes on Days 1, 8, and 15, followed by gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 IV infusion over approximately 30 minutes on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 28-day cycle Subjects who complete 6 cycles of nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine without disease progression or unacceptable toxicities, the Investigator will then determine the best option for the subject. * Continuation of nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine therapy to disease progression or unacceptable toxicity OR * Chemoradiation therapy consisting of the concurrent use of capecitabine or gemcitabine with radiation according to institutional practice OR * Surgical intervention nab-Paclitaxel plus Gemcitabine nab-Paclitaxel nab-Paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 intravenous (IV) infusion over approximately 30 to 45 minutes on Days 1, 8, and 15, followed by gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 IV infusion over approximately 30 minutes on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 28-day cycle Subjects who complete 6 cycles of nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine without disease progression or unacceptable toxicities, the Investigator will then determine the best option for the subject. * Continuation of nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine therapy to disease progression or unacceptable toxicity OR * Chemoradiation therapy consisting of the concurrent use of capecitabine or gemcitabine with radiation according to institutional practice OR * Surgical intervention nab-Paclitaxel plus Gemcitabine Gemcitabine nab-Paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 intravenous (IV) infusion over approximately 30 to 45 minutes on Days 1, 8, and 15, followed by gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 IV infusion over approximately 30 minutes on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 28-day cycle Subjects who complete 6 cycles of nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine without disease progression or unacceptable toxicities, the Investigator will then determine the best option for the subject. * Continuation of nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine therapy to disease progression or unacceptable toxicity OR * Chemoradiation therapy consisting of the concurrent use of capecitabine or gemcitabine with radiation according to institutional practice OR * Surgical intervention nab-Paclitaxel plus Gemcitabine Capecitabine nab-Paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 intravenous (IV) infusion over approximately 30 to 45 minutes on Days 1, 8, and 15, followed by gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 IV infusion over approximately 30 minutes on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 28-day cycle Subjects who complete 6 cycles of nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine without disease progression or unacceptable toxicities, the Investigator will then determine the best option for the subject. * Continuation of nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine therapy to disease progression or unacceptable toxicity OR * Chemoradiation therapy consisting of the concurrent use of capecitabine or gemcitabine with radiation according to institutional practice OR * Surgical intervention
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Kaplan-Meier Estimates for Time to Treatment Failure (TTF) Day 1 of study treatment up to 28.75 months; (maximum time for the last tumor assessment) TTF was defined as the time after the first dose of study therapy to discontinuation of study therapy due to disease progression, death by any cause, or the start of a new non-protocol-defined anticancer therapy/surgery. If a participant does not progress, die or start a new non-protocol-defined anticancer therapy, the participant was censored on the last tumor assessment date.
Tumor evaluations of CT or MRI scans were assessed by the investigative sites and response determined according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) guidelines, version 1.1.
The definition for progressive disease (PD) was \>= 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions from nadir, and the sum showed an absolute increase of \>= 5 mm; the progression of a non-target lesion or the appearance of any new lesions is also considered progression.
Median and its 90% confidence interval (CI) of TTF were estimated using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Participant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30): Symptom Scales and Single Symptom Items Baseline (Day -1), Day 1 of each cycle, for up to 19 cycles each cycle consisting of 28 days and the 28-day follow-up visit The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) is a validated health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measure. The EORTC QLQ-C30 is composed of both multi-item scales and single-item measures, including 5 functional scales, 3 symptom scales, 6 single symptom items, and 1 global health status / quality of life scale. No item occurs in more than one scale. All reported measures are transformed to a 0 to 100 scale. In the symptom scales and single symptom items, 0 = optimal health state and 100 = worst possible health state. The best score on treatment is the best score from all post-baseline visits and is compared to the baseline to get the following responder categories. Responder categories: - Improved: \>=10 decrease from baseline - Stable: neither increase nor decrease \>10 - Worsened: \>=10 increase from baseline
Participant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire For Pancreatic Cancer (EORTC-QLQ PAN26): Six Summary Scales Baseline (Day -1), Day 1 of each cycle, for up to 19 cycles each cycle consisting of 28 days and the 28-day follow-up visit The EORTC pancreatic cancer module is a validated tool intended for patients at all disease stages undergoing surgical resection, palliative surgical intervention, endoscopic palliation or palliative chemotherapy. The module includes 26 questions, organized into 7 scales and 10 individual item scores. All reported measures are transformed to a 0 to 100 scale. Six summary scales reported are: - Pancreatic Pain - Digestive Symptoms - Altered Bowel Habits - Hepatic Scale - Body Image - Sexuality Scores of 0 = optimal health state and 100 = worst possible health state. The best score on treatment is the best score from all post-baseline visits and is compared to the baseline. Responder categories: - Improved: \>=MID decrease from baseline - Stable: no increase or decrease \>MID - Worsened: \>=MID increase from baseline MID = half the baseline standard deviation
Participant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire For Pancreatic Cancer (EORTC-QLQ PAN26): Satisfaction With Health Care Scale Baseline (Day -1), Day 1 of each cycle, for up to 19 cycles each cycle consisting of 28 days and the 28-day follow-up visit The EORTC pancreatic cancer module is a validated tool intended for patients at all disease stages undergoing surgical resection, palliative surgical intervention, endoscopic palliation or palliative chemotherapy. The module includes 26 questions, organized into 7 scales and 10 individual item scores. The summary scale for Satisfaction with Health Care is reported. All reported measures are transformed to a 0 to 100 scale. Scores of 0 = not satisfied, worst possible health state and 100 = extremely satisfied, best possible health state. The best score on treatment is the best score from all post-baseline visits and is compared to the baseline to get the following responder categories. Responder categories: - Improved: \>=MID increase from baseline - Stable: no increase or decrease \>MID - Worsened: \>=MID decrease from baseline MID = half the baseline standard deviation
Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Day 1 of study drug up to end of the study; up to 31.3 months TEAEs are defined as any adverse event (AE) that begin or worsen on or after the start of study drug or procedure of the study period through the maximum duration of the period plus 28 days. The severity of AEs was graded based on National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), Version 4.0 and the scale: Grade 1 = Mild Grade 2 = Moderate Grade 3 = Severe Grade 4 = Life threatening Grade 5 = Death. Relation to study drug was determined by the investigator. A treatment-related TEAE is defined as TEAE which was considered to be related to one or both of the study drugs and reported as 'Suspected' on the case report form. AEs with a missing relationship were treated as 'treatment-related' in data summaries. IP (investigational product) refers to nab-Paclitaxel and/or Gemcitabine. "Related" TEAE refers to relation to study drug (IP).
Disease Control Rate (DCR): Percentage of Participants With Complete (CR) or Partial Response (PR), or Stable Disease (SD) for ≥ 16 Weeks According to RECIST Version 1.1 Day 1 of study treatment up to the end of investigator choice period plus 28 days; up to 76.9 weeks DCR was defined as the percentage of participants with a CR or PR or SD from of date of first treatment to 16 weeks. Tumor assessments after start of non-protocol-defined anticancer therapy were excluded.
RECIST 1.1 Definition:
* CR: disappearance of all target and non-target lesions; any pathological lymph nodes (target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm and no new lesions diagnosed.
* PR: a \>= 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions from baseline; no evidence of progression in any of the non-target lesions diagnosed at baseline; and no new lesions diagnosed.
* SD: neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase of lesions to qualify for PD.
The two-sided 90% binomial confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated by Wilson score method.Overall Response Rate (ORR): Percentage of Participants With Complete (CR) or Partial Response (PR) According to RECIST Version 1.1 Day 1 of study treatment up to the end of investigator choice period plus 28 days; up to 76.9 weeks ORR was defined as the percentage of participants that achieved a combined incidence of complete (CR) and partial response (PR) using RECIST 1.1 guidelines as assessed by the investigator. Assessments after new non-protocol-defined anticancer therapy are excluded. For participants who had resectable surgery in Investigator Choice period, assessments after surgical intervention are excluded.
RECIST 1.1 Definition:
* CR: disappearance of all target and non-target lesions; any pathological lymph nodes (target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm and no new lesions diagnosed.
* PR: a \>= 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions from baseline; no evidence of progression in any of the non-target lesions diagnosed at baseline; and no new lesions diagnosed.
The two-sided 90% binomial confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated by Wilson score methodKaplan-Meier Estimate of Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Day 1 of study treatment up to 28.75 months (maximum time for the last tumor assessment) Progression-free Survival (PFS) was defined as the time from the date of the first dose to the date of disease progression or death (by any cause), whichever is earlier. The analysis day was calculated from enrollment date for one participant who was not treated. Participants who have no disease progression or have not died were censored to last tumor assessment date with progression-free.
The definition for progressive disease (PD) was at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions from nadir; the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of \>= 5 mm; the progression of a non-target lesion or the appearance of any new lesions is also considered progression.
Median and its 90% confidence interval of PFS were estimated using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley.Kaplan-Meier Estimates for Overall Survival (OS) Day 1 of study treatment up to 31.34 months (maximum time for survival follow-up) Overall survival was defined as the time from the date of first dose of study therapy to the date of death (by any cause). Participants who were alive at the end of study or clinical data cut were censored on the last known time that the participant was alive or the clinical cutoff date, whichever was earlier. Median and its 90% confidence interval of OS were estimated using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley
Participant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30): Global Health Status and 5 Functioning Scales Baseline (Day -1), Day 1 of each cycle, for up to 19 cycles each cycle consisting of 28 days and the 28-day follow-up visit The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) is a validated health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measure. The EORTC QLQ-C30 is composed of both multi-item scales and single-item measures, including 5 functional scales, 3 symptom scales, 6 single symptom items, and 1 global health status / quality of life scale. No item occurs in more than one scale. All reported measures are transformed to a 0 - 100 scale. In the Global Health Status and 5 functional scales, 0 = worst possible quality of life/health status and 100 = best possible quality of life/health status. The best score on treatment is the best score from all post-baseline visits and is compared to the baseline to get the following responder categories. Responder categories: - Improved: \>=10 increase from baseline - Stable: neither increase nor decrease \>10 - Worsened: \>=10 decrease from baseline
Participant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire For Pancreatic Cancer (EORTC-QLQ PAN26): 10 Individual Item Scores Baseline (Day -1), Day 1 of each cycle, for up to 19 cycles each cycle consisting of 28 days and the 28-day follow-up visit The EORTC pancreatic cancer module is a validated tool intended for patients at all disease stages undergoing surgical resection, palliative surgical intervention, endoscopic palliation or palliative chemotherapy. The module includes 26 questions, organized into 7 scales and 10 individual item scores. The 10 individual item scores are reported. All reported measures are transformed to a 0 to 100 scale. Scores of 0 = best possible health state and 100 = worst possible health state. The best score on treatment is the best score from all post-baseline visits and is compared to the baseline to get the following responder categories. Responder categories: - Improved: \>=MID decrease from baseline - Stable: no increase or decrease \>MID - Worsened: \>=MID increase from baseline MID = half the baseline standard deviation
Trial Locations
- Locations (42)
University of Massachusetts
🇺🇸Worcester, Massachusetts, United States
Mark H Zangmeister Center
🇺🇸Columbus, Ohio, United States
Tufts - New England Medical Center
🇺🇸Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Houston Methodist Cancer Center
🇺🇸Houston, Texas, United States
Piedmont Cancer Institute PC
🇺🇸Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Smilow Cancer Hospital At Yale-New Haven
🇺🇸New Haven, Connecticut, United States
ME Center for Cancer Medicine
🇺🇸Scarborough, Maine, United States
Montefiore Einstein Cancer Center
🇺🇸Bronx, New York, United States
Cancer Treatment Centers of America - Southeastern Regional Medical Center
🇺🇸Newnan, Georgia, United States
Florida Hospital Cancer Institute
🇺🇸Orlando, Florida, United States
Tom Baker Cancer Center
🇨🇦Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria San Martino
🇮🇹Genova, Italy
Hospital Universitario Marques de Valdecilla
🇪🇸Santander, Spain
Clinical Research Alliance
🇺🇸Lake Success, New York, United States
Centre Regional de lutte contre le cancer Paul Papin
🇫🇷Angers, France
McGill University
🇨🇦Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Roswell Park Cancer Institute
🇺🇸Buffalo, New York, United States
CHUM Hôpital Saint-Luc
🇨🇦Montreal, Quebec, Canada
CHRU Besancon
🇫🇷Besançon, France
Policlinico Universitario Campus Biomedico Di Roma
🇮🇹Roma, Italy
ICO-Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol
🇪🇸Barcelona, Spain
Hopital Saint Antoine
🇫🇷Paris, France
Hospital Miguel Servet
🇪🇸Zaragoza, Spain
Hopital Beaujon
🇫🇷Clichy cedex, France
Saint Joseph Mercy Ann Arbor Hospital
🇺🇸Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
Regional Cancer Care Associates LLC
🇺🇸Morristown, New Jersey, United States
Karmanos Cancer Center Wayne State University
🇺🇸Detroit, Michigan, United States
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
🇺🇸Nashville, Tennessee, United States
Georgetown University Medical Center Lombardi Cancer Center
🇺🇸Washington, District of Columbia, United States
Centre Hospitalier Belfort Montbeliard
🇫🇷Besançon, France
Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center
🇺🇸Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States
Hopital Haut Leveque
🇫🇷Pessac Cedex, France
Mayo Clinic - Arizona
🇺🇸Scottsdale, Arizona, United States
UC Davis Cancer Center
🇺🇸Sacramento, California, United States
British Columbia Cancer Agency
🇨🇦Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Ospedale Sacro Cuore di Gesu FatebeneFratelli
🇮🇹Benevento, Italy
Hospital Clinico San Carlos
🇪🇸Madrid, Spain
Hospital Universitario a Coruna
🇪🇸A Coruna, Spain
Scripps Clinic Torrey Pines
🇺🇸San Diego, California, United States
State University of New York Upstate Medical Center
🇺🇸Syracuse, New York, United States
Levine Cancer Institute
🇺🇸Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
Cross Cancer Institute
🇨🇦Edmonton, Alberta, Canada