MedPath

Buccal Bone Resorption in Immediate Implants in Thin and Thick Buccal Plates of Bone in Esthetic Zone

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Buccal Bone Thickness
Interventions
Other: immediate implant placement
Registration Number
NCT04630665
Lead Sponsor
Cairo University
Brief Summary

To achieve esthetic immediate implants a minimum of adequate buccal bone thickness must be present. It was postulated that 2 mm of buccal bone thickness was needed to prevent recession of the buccal plate. However, this was reduced to 1 mm with more ongoing research. In a recent study postulated that a buccal bone thickness less than 1 mm could be sufficient.

Scarce literature was found that monitored the ridge alterations following implant placement.

In regards to the controversies regarding the minimal initial buccal bone thickness required to perform immediate implant placement, our study aims to monitor the buccal bone thickness and soft tissue changes over a year from implant and prosthetic placement.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
18
Inclusion Criteria
  • Subjects who have at least one unrestorable tooth in the esthetic zone that needs to be extracted.
  • Subjects with healthy systemic condition.
  • Availability of bone apical and palatal to the socket to provide primary stability.
Exclusion Criteria
  • Patients with signs of acute infection related to the area of interest.
  • Patients with habits that may jeopardize the implant longevity and affect the results of the study such as parafunctional habits.
  • Smokers

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
thin buccal boneimmediate implant placementimmediate implant placement in thin buccal bone wall socket
≥1 buccal boneimmediate implant placementimmediate implant placement in 1 mm or more buccal bone thickness socket
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
buccal bone thickness1 year

measurement of buccal bone thickness by a specially designed device and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) analysis

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
pink esthetic score (PES)1 year

to assess esthetics, the score is from 0-14 0 being worst , 14 being best.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Cairo University

🇪🇬

Cairo, Greater Cairo, Egypt

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath