跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT05559424
NCT05559424尚未招募不适用

Head-to-head Comparison of Stent Geometry Obtained by Different Ballooning Techniques in Large Bifurcations Treated by Provisional Stenting

Catholic University of the Sacred Heart2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 60 人开始时间: 2022年10月最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
尚未招募
入组人数
60
试验地点
2
主要终点
Stent expansion

研究概览

简要总结

Single-stent strategy with provisional approach represents the gold standard for percutaneous coronary intervention of bifurcation lesions, and, according to European Bifurcation Club, performing provisional approach presents two steps considered as mandatory: "crossover stenting" in main vessel (MV) and subsequent post-dilation or "POT" (proximal optimization technique). While consensus exists regarding these first two steps, the exact optimal following sequence in case of side branch (SB) jeopardize after main vessel stenting is still a matter of debate.

Actually, the two most used techniques in this setting are represented by the simultaneous inflation of two balloons located respectively in the MV and SB followed by a second POT (POT/kissing balloon/POT technique) and the isolated inflation of a balloon placed in the SB followed by a second POT (POT/SIDE/POT technique).

The objective of this study is to compare the configuration achieved with POT/KISS/POT (PKP) and POT/SIDE/POT (PSP), using the "cutting edge" high-resolution intracoronary imaging modality (Optical Coherence Tomography, OCT).

详细描述

A preclinical phase of the study (CRABBS-VHL) was performed in isolated porcine hearts comparing the two common side-branch (SB) optimization techniques after stent implantation in the main vessel (MV): proximal optimization technique (POT) + kissing balloon inflation + final POT (PKP arm) and POT + isolated balloon inflation + final POT (PSP arm).

A total of 30 PCIs were successfully performed. Baseline characteristics of treated bifurcations were similar between the two study arms. Minimum stent expansion at the distal main vessel (MV) segment was significantly lower with PSP as compared with PKP as assessed by both OCT and Micro-CT . Other significant findings included: higher stent eccentricity index at proximal MV with PSP, higher SB scaffolding length and lower malapposition (at bifurcation core and distal MV) with PKP.

These data need to be confirmed by further randomized studies in humans.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 100 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • 未提供

排除标准

  • 未提供

结局指标

主要结局

Stent expansion

时间窗: Intra-procedural

Minimum stent expansion

次要结局

  • Stent malapposition(Intra-procedural)
  • Stent proximal edge dissection(Intra-procedural)
  • Stent complicatons(Intra-procedural)
  • Intracoronary thrombus(Intra-procedural)
  • Side branch ostial scaffolding length(Intra-procedural)
  • Additional treatment after OCT(Intra-procedural)
  • Tissue prolapse(Intra-procedural)
  • Stent complications(Intra-procedural)
  • Side branch ostium dissection(Intra-procedural)
  • Stent eccentricity index(Intra-procedural)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Francesco Burzotta

Principal investigator

Catholic University of the Sacred Heart

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验

Comparison of Results Achieved by Different... | 临床试验