Patient Satisfaction and Crestal Bone Loss of Polymer Infiltrated Ceramic Network Versus Lithium Disilicate Implant Hybrid Abutment Crowns in Esthetic Zone
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Hybrid Crowns on Single Implants in Esthetic Zone
- Sponsor
- Cairo University
- Enrollment
- 36
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- patient satisfaction
- Last Updated
- 8 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
P: Population: Patients requiring single unit implant restoration in esthetic zone I: Intervention: Polymer-infiltrated-ceramic-network abutment crown (VITA Enamic-VITA Zahnfabrik) C: Comparison: Lithium disilicate ceramic abutment crown (IPS e. max-Ivoclar Vivadent) O: Outcome: patient satisfaction , crestal bone loss and periodontal parameters T: Time: 12 months S :Randomized controlled trial research question:For patients receiving implants in esthetic zone, Does the use of polymer-infiltrated-ceramic-network hybrid abutment crown offer better patient satisfaction , less bone loss and better peri-implant clinical parameters when compared to lithium disilicate hybrid abutment crowns?
Investigators
Inas Adel Mahmoud
assistant lecturer,fixed prosthodontic department, faculty of oral and dental medicine
Cairo University
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Patients above 18 years old.
- •Patients able to read and sign the informed consent document.
- •Medically free patients or with controlled systemic disease.
- •Patients with good bone quality and quantity evaluated using C.B.C.T.
- •Patients willing to return for follow-up examinations and evaluation.
- •Patients having single missing recently extracted premolar tooth.
Exclusion Criteria
- •Young patients in growth stage.
- •Patients with unsuitable implantation sites (patients with major boney defects or sever bone resorption)
- •Pregnant women to avoid any complication that may occur in dental office.
- •Patients with uncontrolled systemic disease (hypertensive patient or uncontrolled diabetic patient)
- •Psychiatric problems or unrealistic expectations.
- •Multiple adjacent missing teeth.
- •Patients with bad oral hygiene. -
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
patient satisfaction
Time Frame: 12 months
using visual analogue scale (o-unsatisfied up to max 10 satisfied)
Secondary Outcomes
- crestal bone loss(12 months)