Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT03333889
NCT03333889UnknownNot Applicable

Patient Satisfaction and Crestal Bone Loss of Polymer Infiltrated Ceramic Network Versus Lithium Disilicate Implant Hybrid Abutment Crowns in Esthetic Zone

Cairo University1 site in 1 country36 target enrollmentStarted: January 1, 2018Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Enrollment
36
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
patient satisfaction

Study Overview

Brief Summary

P: Population: Patients requiring single unit implant restoration in esthetic zone I: Intervention: Polymer-infiltrated-ceramic-network abutment crown (VITA Enamic-VITA Zahnfabrik) C: Comparison: Lithium disilicate ceramic abutment crown (IPS e. max-Ivoclar Vivadent) O: Outcome: patient satisfaction , crestal bone loss and periodontal parameters T: Time: 12 months S :Randomized controlled trial research question:For patients receiving implants in esthetic zone, Does the use of polymer-infiltrated-ceramic-network hybrid abutment crown offer better patient satisfaction , less bone loss and better peri-implant clinical parameters when compared to lithium disilicate hybrid abutment crowns?

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking Description

double blind :outcome asessor,participant

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to 60 Years (Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patients above 18 years old.
  • Patients able to read and sign the informed consent document.
  • Medically free patients or with controlled systemic disease.
  • Patients with good bone quality and quantity evaluated using C.B.C.T.
  • Patients willing to return for follow-up examinations and evaluation.
  • Patients having single missing recently extracted premolar tooth.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Young patients in growth stage.
  • Patients with unsuitable implantation sites (patients with major boney defects or sever bone resorption)
  • Pregnant women to avoid any complication that may occur in dental office.
  • Patients with uncontrolled systemic disease (hypertensive patient or uncontrolled diabetic patient)
  • Psychiatric problems or unrealistic expectations.
  • Multiple adjacent missing teeth.
  • Patients with bad oral hygiene. -

Arms & Interventions

E-max hybrid crown

Active Comparator

E-max hybrid crown Lithium Disilicate based ceramic which is characterized by high strength and optimum esthetics and considered a gold standard in anterior restorations

Intervention: emax hybrid crown (Other)

Vita Enamic hybrid crown

Experimental

Vita Enamic hybrid crown polymer infilltrated ceramic network(hybrid ceramic) characterized by low modulus of elasticity that acts as cushion on implants.

Intervention: Vita Enamic hybrid crown (Other)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

patient satisfaction

Time Frame: 12 months

using visual analogue scale (o-unsatisfied up to max 10 satisfied)

Secondary Outcomes

  • crestal bone loss(12 months)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Inas Adel Mahmoud

assistant lecturer,fixed prosthodontic department, faculty of oral and dental medicine

Cairo University

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials