跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT01936168
NCT01936168已完成不适用

Mechanochemical Endovenous Ablation (MOCA) Versus RADiofrequeNcy Ablation (RFA) in the Treatment of Primary Great Saphenous Varicose Veins: a Multicentre Randomized Trial

Rijnstate Hospital5 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 213 人开始时间: 2016年12月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
213
试验地点
5
主要终点
Occlusion rate

研究概览

简要总结

The newly developed Mechanochemical Endovenous Ablation (MOCA) device uses a technique that combines mechanical endothelial damage using a rotating wire with the infusion of a liquid sclerosant. Heating of the vein and tumescent anesthesia are not required; only local anesthesia is utilized at the insertion site. Previously we showed that endovenous MOCA, using polidocanol, is feasible and safe in the treatment of great spahenous vein (GSV) incompetence. However, larger studies with a prolonged follow-up to prove the efficacy of this technique in terms of obliteration rates are lacking. This randomized trial was designed to compare occlusion rate, post-operative pain and complications between radiofrequency ablation (RFA: the current treatment for GSV incompetence) en MOCA.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 80 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Insufficiency of the GSV
  • Signed informed consent
  • Patient willing to participate in follow-up scheme
  • Age > 18 years
  • Ultrasound criteria for endovenous treatment have been met:
  • Diameter GSV between 3-12 mm
  • No thrombus in the to be treated segment of the GSV

排除标准

  • Patient not able to give informed consent
  • Patient unable to present at follow-up visits
  • Other treatment is more suitable
  • Pregnancy and breast feeding
  • Known allergy/ contra-indication for sclerotherapy
  • Previous ipsilateral surgical treatment of varicose veins
  • Deep venous thrombosis or lung emboli in medical history
  • Anticoagulant therapy
  • C5-C6 varices
  • Immobilization
  • Fontaine II or IV peripheral arterial disease
  • Severe kidney function decline (GFS < 30 mL/min)
  • Coagulation disorder or increased risk for thrombo-embolic complications(hemofilie A or B, v. Willebrand disease, Glanzmann disease, Factor VII-deficiency, idiopatic thrombocytopenic purpura, Factor V Leiden)
  • Liver diseases accompanied by changes in blood coagulation, livver cirrhosis

结局指标

主要结局

Occlusion rate

时间窗: up to 5 years

Occlusion rates between treatments will be compared at mentioned time points (both technical and clinical success)

次要结局

  • Procedure duration(30 days)
  • Health status(1 year, 5 years)
  • Complications(30 days)
  • Post procedural pain score(two weeks)
  • Disease related quality of life(1 year, 5 years)
  • Per-procedural pain score(two weeks)
  • Costs of both treatments(1 year)

研究者

发起方
Rijnstate Hospital
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Michel Reijnen

Surgeon

Rijnstate Hospital

研究点 (5)

Loading locations...

相似试验