To Study the Efficacy & Safety of Oral NA-921 (Bionetide) in Girls and Women with Rett Syndrome
- Conditions
- Rett Syndrome
- Interventions
- Drug: Placebo
- Registration Number
- NCT06849973
- Lead Sponsor
- Biomed Industries, Inc.
- Brief Summary
To study the efficacy \& safety of oral Bionetide versus placebo in girls and women with Rett syndrome
- Detailed Description
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 2/3 Study of NA-921 (Bionetide) for the Treatment of Girls and Women with Rett Syndrome
Primary Objective • To investigate the efficacy and safety of treatment with oral NA-921 (Bionetide) versus placebo in girls and women with Rett syndrome
Key Secondary Objective • To investigate the efficacy of treatment with oral NA-921 (Bionetide) versus placebo on ability to communicate in girls and women with Rett syndrome
Co-Primary Endpoints
* Rett Syndrome Behavior Questionnaire (RSBQ) total score - Change from Baseline to Week 12
* Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) Score at Week 12
Key Secondary Endpoint
Change from Baseline to Week 12 in:
• Communication and Symbolic Behavior Scales Developmental Profile™ Infant-Toddler Checklist- Social Composite Score (CSBS-DP-IT Social)
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- Female
- Target Recruitment
- 187
Not provided
Not provided
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Placebo Comparator: Placebo Placebo Bionetide placebo solution of 20-40 mL based on the subject's weight at Baseline, administered twice daily by mouth or gastrostomy tube (G-tube)
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Rett Syndrome Behavior Questionnaire (RSBQ) Total Score - Change From Baseline to Week 12 Baseline and Week 12 The RSBQ is a 45-item caregiver-completed rating scale that includes 45 items, 39 of them grouped into 8 subscales, whose ratings reflect the severity and frequency of symptoms. Items are rated as 0 (not true), 1 (somewhat or sometimes true), or 2 (very true). The 8 subscales are general mood, breathing problems, hand behavior, face movements, body rocking/expressionless face, night-time behaviors, fear/anxiety, and walking/standing. Scores for item 31 are reversed in the calculation of the total score. The total score ranges from 0 to 90 and is calculated as the sum of the item scores. Higher scores mean worse behavior.
Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) Score at Week 12 12 Weeks Treatment Duration To rate how much the subject's illness has improved or worsened relative to a baseline state, a 7-point scale is used from 1=very much improved, 2=much improved, 3=minimally improved, 4=no change, 5=minimally worse, 6=much worse, 7=very much worse.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Communication and Symbolic Behavior Scales Developmental Profile™ Infant-Toddler Checklist - Social Composite Score (CSBS-DP-IT Social) 12 Weeks Treatment Duration Standardized screening scale for assessing communication and pre-linguistic skills in young children 12-24 months and can be used with older children with developmental delay. The CSBS-DP includes a suite of three separate measures: The Infant-Toddler Checklist, a follow-up Caregiver Questionnaire and a Behavior Sample. In this study only the Infant-Toddler (CSBS-DP-IT) Checklist was used. The CSBS-DP-IT Checklist is a 24-item rating scale and each item is scored using a three-level rating of frequency: "not yet", "sometimes" and "often". The CSBS-DP-IT Social Composite score the range was 0 to 26 and a higher score represented a worse outcome. Three composite scores can be calculated: 1) Social Composite; 2) Speech Composite; 3) Symbolic Composite.
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Rett Syndrome Clinician Rating of Ability to Communicate Choices (RTT-COMC) 12 Weeks Treatment Duration Clinical assessment of the subject's ability to communicate their choices or preferences, which can include the use of nonverbal means such as eye contact or gestures. The assessment is made on an 8-point Likert scale (0-7) with 0 denoting normal functioning and 7 the most severe impairment.
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
Trial Locations
- Locations (16)
Biomed Testing Facility # BIO-02-95817
🇺🇸Sacramento, California, United States
Biomed Testing Facility #BIO-06-60612
🇺🇸Chicago, Illinois, United States
Biomed Testing Facility # BIO-04-92093
🇺🇸La Jolla, California, United States
Biomed Testing Facility # BIO-03-90095
🇺🇸Los Angeles, California, United States
Biomed Testing Facility # BIO-01-94104
🇺🇸San Francisco, California, United States
Biomed Testing Facility #BIO-05-80042
🇺🇸Aurora, Colorado, United States
Maryland Locations Biomed Testing Facility #BIO-7-21205
🇺🇸Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Biomed Testing Facility #BIO-8-02115
🇺🇸Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Biomed Testing Facility #BIO-9-10467
🇺🇸Bronx, New York, United States
Biomed Testing Facility #BIO-10-44195
🇺🇸Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Biomed Testing Facility #BIO-11-77030
🇺🇸Houston, Texas, United States
Biomed Testing Facility #BIO-12-98105
🇺🇸Seattle, Washington, United States
Biomed Research Unit-BIO-16-NSW
🇦🇺Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
Biomed Research Unit-BIO-15
🇦🇺Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
Biomed Research Unit-BIO-13-VIC-3084 Heidelberg West, Victoria, Australia, 3084
🇦🇺Heidelberg West, Victoria, Australia
Biomed Research Unit- BIO-14-VIC 3010
🇦🇺Parkville, Victoria, Australia