A Multicenter, Post Marketing Clinical Follow up (PMCF) Investigation to Evaluate the Performance and Safety of a Soft Silicone Foam Dressing and to Evaluate the Performance of Standard Care in Exuding Venous Leg Ulcers
- Conditions
- Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU)
- Interventions
- Other: standard careDevice: Mepilex XT
- Registration Number
- NCT02167815
- Lead Sponsor
- Molnlycke Health Care AB
- Brief Summary
This investigation is a Post Marketing Follow-Up Study for Mepilex XT conducted as part of Mölnlycke Health Care's quality system. The primary objective is to evaluate the performance of the dressing when used as intended on exuding Venous Leg Ulcers (VLUs) in the inflammatory and granulating stages of the wound healing process.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 30
-
Venous Leg Ulcer
-
Exuding wound
-
Wound surface covered with sloughy tissue* (before debridement)
-
Wound size ≥ 6 cm2
-
In case of multiple wounds, target wound must be ≥ 3cm distant from other wounds.
-
Wound suitable for treatment with the relevant primary dressing**
-
Male or female, 18 years of age and above
-
Signed Informed Consent
- Sloughy tissue defined as wet, yellow-brown fibrinous tissue present in the wound bed ** Mepilex XT in the intervention group. Standard care in the observation group
- More than two products of 15 cm x15 cm needed to cover the whole wound and affected peri-wound area
- Wound cavity and/or fistula
- Full thickness burns
- Exposed tendons and/or fascia
- Bleeding wounds
- Malignant or fungating wounds
- Wound age > 12 months
- Use of antimicrobial dressings or topical agents such as antiseptics, local antibiotics and steroids within 7 days from inclusion on the wound intended to be included
- Untreated limb ischemia (according to investigator's judgement) at the time of inclusion
- Subject not suitable for the investigation according to the investigator's judgement
- Subject included in other ongoing clinical investigation which could interfere with this investigation, as judged by the investigator
- Known allergy/hypersensitivity to any of the components of the primary dressing
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Standard care standard care standard care ( such as alginate, hydrofiber or other treatment) Intervention ( Mepilex XT) Mepilex XT -
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Changes From Baseline in Condition of the Peri Wound Skin 16 weeks Deteriorationin of skin condition , Mepilex XT and Standard care (%)
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Measure of Actual Dressing Cost and Cost of Care, as Input for Health Economics Calculations. 16 weeks Pain Scores on the Visual Analog Scale 16 weeks Pain at baseline visit, compared with pain at week 16. VAS scale, minimum pain = 0, maximum pain = 100.
Users Feedback After Handling or Use as a Measure of Performance. 16 weeks Investigator/Nurse and Subject evaluation of performance of the primary dressing ( n) Scale= Good , Very Good, Poor, Very Poor
1Ease of application, 2 Ease of removal, 3 Ability to retain exudate, 4 Adherence to healthy skin, 5 Confomability to be repositioned , 6 Overall satisfaction, 7 Dressing sticking to wound bed, 8 Presence of residues on the wound bed. 9 Presence of residues on the healthy skin. 10 Overall evaluation of change in periwound skin condition.
Trial Locations
- Locations (3)
The General University Hospital in Prague
🇨🇿Prague, Czech Republic
Nemocnice Podlesí a.s.
🇨🇿Třinec, Konská 453, Czech Republic
Nemocnice Jihlava
🇨🇿Jihlava, Vrchlického, Czech Republic