Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT04731766
NCT04731766UnknownNot Applicable

Effectiveness of Using Nano-Silver Fluoride Varnish Versus Sodium Fluoride Varnish in Management of Cervical Dentin Hypersensitivity in Adult Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Nayera Hassanien Mohamed0 sites42 target enrollmentStarted: November 1, 2021Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Sponsor
Enrollment
42
Primary Endpoint
change in dentin Hypersensitivity

Study Overview

Brief Summary

2 different varnishes will be used to test their effectiveness in controlling teeth hypersensitivity in adult patient.

Detailed Description

In-vivo part:

Each varnish will be applied separately on different teeth according to the manufacturer's instructions and the VAS will be measured according to a specific timeline: T0 (baseline, before application of varnish), T1 (1 week after application), T2 (4 weeks after application) and T3 (4 weeks after application).

In-situ part:

Dentin specimen will be prepared from extracted teeth from the orthodontic department in our college, sterilized and prepared.

it will be bonded to an orthodontic wire and bonded to upper first molar. Dentinal occlusion will be measured using scanning electron microscope following the same timeline.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care Provider, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
25 Years to 50 Years (Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Patients consulting in one of the Qasr Einy, faculty of dentistry outpatient clinics.
  • •Males or females.
  • •Patient's age range 25-50 years.
  • •Patients complaining of hypersensitive areas on facial surfaces of the teeth (incisors, cuspids, bi-cuspids, and first molars with exposed cervical dentine) with teeth scoring Bpain (VAS score: greater than or equal to 3) during application of stimulus (airblast and tactile sensitivity test).
  • •Tooth with exposed root surface, complaining from hypersensitivity (VAS score; greater than or equal to 3).
  • •Patients accept the 2-months follow-up period.
  • •Provide informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

  • •• Patients participating in another dental study that may alter the results of this study.
  • •A medical condition that could hinder the accuracy of pain reporting (e.g., pain disorders).
  • •Any chronic medical condition that requires the regular use of anti-inflammatory pain medications.
  • •Patients used or applied a desensitizing varnish within the last four weeks.
  • •Patients with dental problems; chipped teeth, defective restorations, fractured Un-displaced cuspids or deep dental caries.
  • •Lack of patient's approval and compliance.

Arms & Interventions

Citrine 5% Sodium Fluoride

Active Comparator

It was developed to prolong the contact between the tooth surface and fluoride to increase the resistance against caries attack and manage tooth hypersensitivity; the active ingredient of fluoride varnish is mostly 5% sodium fluoride.

Intervention: Citrine 5 % sodium fluoride (Behavioral)

concocuted Nano-silver fluoride

Experimental

Nano-silver fluoride (NSF) is a laboratory synthesized solution

Intervention: concocted nano-silver fluoride (Behavioral)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

change in dentin Hypersensitivity

Time Frame: 1 week, 4 weeks & 8 weeks

Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) will be used; 0 is no pain and 10 is severe pain. Pictures are added to the same, as well as colors to guide the patient during selection of pain severity.

Secondary Outcomes

  • change in dentinal Tubule Occlusion(1 week, 4 weeks * 8 weeks)

Investigators

Sponsor
Nayera Hassanien Mohamed
Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor Investigator
Principal Investigator

Nayera Hassanien Mohamed

Assistant Lecturer

Cairo University

Similar Trials