MedPath

Temporomandibular Joint Eminence Augmentation Using Titanium Ring Inlay: A New Surgical Technique

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
TMJ
Augmentation
TMJ - Oral &Amp;Maxillofacial Surgery
Registration Number
NCT06936072
Lead Sponsor
Sinai University
Brief Summary

To evaluate the efficacy of titanium ring inlay in ESS technique in Temporomandibular joint eminence augmentation

Detailed Description

Background:Temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disorders affect approximately 5-12% of the population, with eminence augmentation being a challenging surgical intervention. Current techniques using autogenous grafts or alloplastic materials present limitations including donor site morbidity, resorption, and implant failure. This study evaluates a novel titanium ring inlay technique for TMJ eminence augmentation, which may offer improved stability, osseointegration, and functional outcomes.

Patients and Methods: A prospective study was conducted on 100 patients (28 males, 72 females; age range: 25-41 years) with TMJ Temporomandibular joint eminence augmentation. Study was performed after ethical approval from Research Ethics Committee, Faculty of Dentistry, Sinai University OMS 01-04-024; . Titanium ring inlay procedure was performed to Temporomandibular joint eminence augmentation. Preoperative and postoperative assessments included pain levels (VAS pain), maximum mouth opening (MMO), Clicking during mouth opening, Headach presence, tinnitus and subjective patient feedback.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
112
Inclusion Criteria
  • Diagnosed TMJ dysfunction requiring eminence augmentation
  • Failed conservative management (≥3 months)
  • Adequate bone stock for inlay placement
  • Willingness to comply with follow-up protocol
Exclusion Criteria
  • Systemic conditions contraindicating surgery
  • Active TMJ infection
  • Previous TMJ surgery
  • Pregnancy
  • Neuromuscular disorders-

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Functional improvementBaseline (T0); T1 (1 months postoperative); T2 (3 months postoperative); T3 (6 months postoperative); T4 (12 months postoperative).

Measuring the Maximal interincisal opening (MIO; mm)

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Pain ScoreBaseline (T0); T1 (1 months postoperative); T2 (3 months postoperative); T3 (6 months postoperative); T4 (12 months postoperative).

Measuring the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), pain score (1-10)

HeadacheBaseline (T0); T1 (1 months postoperative); T2 (3 months postoperative); T3 (6 months postoperative); T4 (12 months postoperative).

Measuring the Headache Assessment Presence Yes/No

TinnitusBaseline (T0); T1 (1 months postoperative); T2 (3 months postoperative); T3 (6 months postoperative); T4 (12 months postoperative).

Tinnitus presence (Y/N)

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Menoufia University, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital

🇪🇬

Menoufia University, Egypt

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath