Temporomandibular Joint Eminence Augmentation Using Titanium Ring Inlay: A New Surgical Technique
- Conditions
- TMJAugmentationTMJ - Oral &Amp;Maxillofacial Surgery
- Registration Number
- NCT06936072
- Lead Sponsor
- Sinai University
- Brief Summary
To evaluate the efficacy of titanium ring inlay in ESS technique in Temporomandibular joint eminence augmentation
- Detailed Description
Background:Temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disorders affect approximately 5-12% of the population, with eminence augmentation being a challenging surgical intervention. Current techniques using autogenous grafts or alloplastic materials present limitations including donor site morbidity, resorption, and implant failure. This study evaluates a novel titanium ring inlay technique for TMJ eminence augmentation, which may offer improved stability, osseointegration, and functional outcomes.
Patients and Methods: A prospective study was conducted on 100 patients (28 males, 72 females; age range: 25-41 years) with TMJ Temporomandibular joint eminence augmentation. Study was performed after ethical approval from Research Ethics Committee, Faculty of Dentistry, Sinai University OMS 01-04-024; . Titanium ring inlay procedure was performed to Temporomandibular joint eminence augmentation. Preoperative and postoperative assessments included pain levels (VAS pain), maximum mouth opening (MMO), Clicking during mouth opening, Headach presence, tinnitus and subjective patient feedback.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 112
- Diagnosed TMJ dysfunction requiring eminence augmentation
- Failed conservative management (≥3 months)
- Adequate bone stock for inlay placement
- Willingness to comply with follow-up protocol
- Systemic conditions contraindicating surgery
- Active TMJ infection
- Previous TMJ surgery
- Pregnancy
- Neuromuscular disorders-
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- SINGLE_GROUP
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Functional improvement Baseline (T0); T1 (1 months postoperative); T2 (3 months postoperative); T3 (6 months postoperative); T4 (12 months postoperative). Measuring the Maximal interincisal opening (MIO; mm)
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Pain Score Baseline (T0); T1 (1 months postoperative); T2 (3 months postoperative); T3 (6 months postoperative); T4 (12 months postoperative). Measuring the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), pain score (1-10)
Headache Baseline (T0); T1 (1 months postoperative); T2 (3 months postoperative); T3 (6 months postoperative); T4 (12 months postoperative). Measuring the Headache Assessment Presence Yes/No
Tinnitus Baseline (T0); T1 (1 months postoperative); T2 (3 months postoperative); T3 (6 months postoperative); T4 (12 months postoperative). Tinnitus presence (Y/N)
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Menoufia University, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital
🇪🇬Menoufia University, Egypt