ISRCTN02335796
Completed
未知
A randomized clinical trial to compare early versus delayed endovenous treatment of superficial venous reflux in patients with chronic venous ulceration
Imperial College London (UK)0 sites450 target enrollmentOctober 3, 2013
Overview
- Phase
- 未知
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Not specified
- Sponsor
- Imperial College London (UK)
- Enrollment
- 450
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- 5 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
- 2018 results in: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29688123 (added 26/04/2018) 2. 2019 results in: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30741425 (added 12/02/2019) 3. 2019 results in: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31140402 (added 30/05/2019) 4. 2020 results in: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32965493/ (added 24/09/2020)
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •1\. Current leg ulceration of greater than 6 weeks, but less than 6 months duration
- •2\. Able to give informed consent to participate in the study after reading the patient information documentation
- •3\. Patient age \> 18 years
- •4\. Ankle Brachial Pressure Index (ABPI) greater than or equal to 0\.8
- •5\. Superficial venous disease on colour duplex assessment deemed to be significant enough to warrant ablation by
- •the treating clinician (either primary or recurrent venous reflux)
- •Patients who cannot speak/understand English will be eligible for inclusion and informed consent will be obtained with assistance from translation services as per standard clinical practice. In view of the lack of cross cultural validation for quality of life tools, only healing outcome data will be collected.
Exclusion Criteria
- •1\. Presence of deep venous occlusive disease or other conditions precluding superficial venous intervention
- •2\. Patients who are unable to tolerate any multilayer compression bandaging will be excluded. However, concordance with compression therapy can be variable for patients at different times. Patients who are generally compliant with compression but unable to tolerate the bandages for short periods will still be eligible for inclusion. A period of noncompliance with compression bandages will not be considered a protocol violation, but a normal variation within the spectrum of standard therapy.
- •3\. Inability of the patient to receive prompt endovenous intervention by the recruiting centre
- •4\. Pregnancy (female participants of reproductive age will be eligible for inclusion in the study, subject to a negative pregnancy test prior to randomisation)
- •5\. Leg ulcer of nonvenous aetiology (as assessed by the responsible clinician)
- •6\. If patient is deemed to require skin grafting they cannot be included
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Not specified
Similar Trials
Completed
Not Applicable
Comparing intervention levels for the support of blood pressure in extremely premature newborn babiesExtreme prematurity, neonatal care, circulatory supportPregnancy and ChildbirthPreterm spontaneous labour with preterm deliveryISRCTN83507686Barts Health NHS Trust (UK)60
Completed
Not Applicable
Reducing implant infection in orthopaedics (RIIiO) pilot studySpecialty: Infectious diseases and microbiology, Primary sub-specialty: Infection preventionUKCRC code/ Disease: Infection/ Bacterial, viral and other infectious agents, Injuries and Accidents/ Injuries to the hip and thighInfections and InfestationsInfection following hip fractureISRCTN74612906Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust515
Terminated
Phase 3
HYMN: a trial comparing hyperthermia and mitomycin chemotherapy with a second BCG treatment, or other standard treatment, for bladder cancer that has come backISRCTN85785327niversity College London (UK)242
Completed
Not Applicable
Study comparing single-incision laparoscopy versus multitrocar laparoscopy totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair (TEP) at 2 yearsnilateral or bilateral inguinal hernia requiring surgical treatmentInjury, Occupational Diseases, PoisoningUnilateral or bilateral inguinal herniaISRCTN63754528Saint-Pierre University Hospital210
Completed
Not Applicable
An open-label, prospective, comparative trial to assess prostate specific antigen progression on bicalutamide monotherapy versus bicalutamide and dutasteride therapy in patients with advanced and/or metastatic carcinoma of the prostateProstate CancerCancerProstate cancerISRCTN47114653Foundation for the Promotion of Urological Scientific Research (STIWU) (The Netherlands)150