Minimally Invasive Versus Conventional Aortic Valve Replacement: a Long Term Registry
- Conditions
- Aortic Valve Surgery
- Interventions
- Procedure: aortic valve replacementDevice: biological prosthetic valveDevice: Mechanical valve
- Registration Number
- NCT02278666
- Lead Sponsor
- Maria Cecilia Hospital
- Brief Summary
The aim of the present study is to assess in a "real life" case list the outcome of three different surgical approaches for isolated aortic valve surgery in terms of surgery times, morbidity and mortality.
- Detailed Description
The study will focus on data recorded and collected from daily clinical treatment of patients undergoing isolated aortic valve replacement due to symptomatic aortic stenosis who consented to the use of their personal data. After surgery patients will be followed up to a minimum of 12 months. In-hospital and follow-up outcomes of the different surgical approaches will be analysed.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 1000
- All patients undergoing isolated aortic valve surgery
- Written Informed consent to the use of personal data
- other associated cardiac surgery
- emergency surgery
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description upper mini-sternotomy aortic valve replacement aortic valve replacement surgery via upper J or T sternotomy (ministernotomy) right mini thoracotomy Mechanical valve aortic valve replacement/repair surgery via right mini thoracotomy conventional sternotomy aortic valve replacement aortic valve replacement surgery via conventional full sternotomy right mini thoracotomy aortic valve replacement aortic valve replacement/repair surgery via right mini thoracotomy upper mini-sternotomy Mechanical valve aortic valve replacement surgery via upper J or T sternotomy (ministernotomy) right mini thoracotomy biological prosthetic valve aortic valve replacement/repair surgery via right mini thoracotomy upper mini-sternotomy biological prosthetic valve aortic valve replacement surgery via upper J or T sternotomy (ministernotomy) conventional sternotomy biological prosthetic valve aortic valve replacement surgery via conventional full sternotomy conventional sternotomy Mechanical valve aortic valve replacement surgery via conventional full sternotomy
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Total duration of Intensive Care Unit stay during hospital stay, usually lasting one to two weeks Blood transfusions during hospital stay, usually lasting one to two weeks Cardiopulmonary bypass time during surgery
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method sepsis during hospital stay, usually lasting one to two weeks in-hospital mortality during hospital stay, usually lasting one to two weeks 30-day mortality 30 days after surgery Neurological complications during hospital stay, usually lasting one to two weeks stroke and/or transient ischemic attacks
Prolonged ventilation during hospital stay longer than 24 hours
renal insufficiency during hospital stay, usually lasting one to two weeks need for haemofiltration
Re-exploration for bleeding during hospital stay, usually lasting one to two weeks need of surgical revision for bleeding
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Maria Cecilia Hospital
🇮🇹Cotignola, Ravenna, Italy
Maria Cecilia Hospital🇮🇹Cotignola, Ravenna, Italy