Clinical Comparison of Preformed Zirconia and Stainless Steel Crowns in Young Permanent Teeth

Completed

Conditions: Other Procedures,

Registration Number: CTRI/2020/01/022801

Lead Sponsor: Dr Abhinav Talekar

Brief Summary: â€œClinical assesment of permanent molar zirconia crownsâ€

Aims:

1)   to assess clinical efficacy of permanent molar crowns

2)   to assess the eruption path of second molar

3)   to  check clinical time required for placement of crown

4)   to assess the opposite teeth wear over the period of time

Methodology:Inclusion criteria:

1)   requirement of placement of crowns on permanent molar after endodontic treatment

2)   teeth required for multisurface restoration followed by crown

3)   permanent second molar is erupting

4)   opposite teeth present

Exclusion criteria:

1)   teeth with poor prognosis

2)   patient refused to participate

Procedure:

Total no of teeth 50  prrmanent molar crowns ( nusmile zirconia

1)   preoperative x ray

2)   local anesthesia

3)   rubber dam application

4)   tooth preparation

5)   try in with pink crown

6)   check bite

7)   cementation with resin gic (nusmile biocem)

8)   follow up with (clinical pictures and x rays)

A)   3 months

B)  6 months

C)    12 months

9)   3d scan of impression with opposite teeth with every follow up

Materials required:

1)   local anesthesia

2)   rubber dam kit

3)   burs

Materials required from company:

1)   total 50 number of zirconia crowns

2)   nusmile biocem gic

Detailed Description: Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status: Completed

Sex: All

Target Recruitment: 30

Inclusion Criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1)Requirement of placement of crowns on permanent molar after endodontic treatment 2)Teeth required for multi surface restoration followed by crown 3)Permanent second molar is erupting 4)Opposite teeth present.

Exclusion Criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1)Teeth with poor prognosis 2)Patient refused to participate.

Study & Design

Study Type: Interventional

Study Design: Not specified

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Both crowns are having equal clinical performance.	One week, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months
Methhodology: MOdified USPHS criteria	One week, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Zironia crowns do not affect eruption of second molar	Methodology:

Trial Locations

Locations (2): M A Rangoonwala college of dental science and research centre, Camp Pune 411001
🇮🇳
Pune, MAHARASHTRA, India
Talekar Children Dental Care
🇮🇳
Pune, MAHARASHTRA, India
M A Rangoonwala college of dental science and research centre, Camp Pune 411001
🇮🇳Pune, MAHARASHTRA, India
Dr AbhinavTalekar
Principal investigator
9503079151
drabhinavtalekar@gmail.com