Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT04228913
NCT04228913
Completed
Phase 4

Comparison of Postoperative Pain Intensity After Three Different Obturation Techniques: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Aydin Adnan Menderes University1 site in 1 country90 target enrollmentAugust 31, 2017

Overview

Phase
Phase 4
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Pain, Postoperative
Sponsor
Aydin Adnan Menderes University
Enrollment
90
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Pain level comparison after root canal obturation with three different obturation technique:: VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) at 6th hours.
Status
Completed
Last Updated
6 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

This study evaluated the postoperative pain after the endodontic treatment by using three different obturation techniques. ( Cold lateral condensation (CLC), thermoplasticized solid-core carrier method (GuttaCore) and cold free-flow compation tecnique ( GuttaFlow2))

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
August 31, 2017
End Date
August 15, 2019
Last Updated
6 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Sponsor
Aydin Adnan Menderes University
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Hicran Dönmez Özkan

Assistant Professor

Aydin Adnan Menderes University

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Participants between 18 - 72 years of ages,
  • 2 Good oral hygiene,
  • Have not taken any analgesic in the last 7 days,
  • Have not taken any antibiotics in the last 7 days,
  • Positive response to both cold test (EndoIce; Coltene/Whaledent Inc, Cuyahoga ),
  • Patients diagnosed with asymptomatic irreversible pulpitis with his/her single-rooted teeth caused by a deep carious lesion,
  • Patients have single-rooted teeth requiring endodontic treatment according to the pre-prosthetic reason,
  • 8.The presence of profusely pulp bleeding with a thick consistency, which is exposed during caries removing.
  • The periapical region was healthy in radiographic diagnosis.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Patients who refuse to participate in this study,
  • Medically compromised patients (with immunosuppressive/systemic diseases, patients on medications),
  • Devital teeth that have no response to pulp test,
  • The presence of advanced periodontal disease (probing depth \> 4 mm),
  • The presence of open apex,
  • The presence of calcification,
  • The presence of resorption,
  • Patients who had multiple teeth requiring endodontic treatment,
  • Patients with allergic sensitivity to materials and agents that should be used during the root canal treatment,
  • Allergic sensitivity to local anesthetics,

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Pain level comparison after root canal obturation with three different obturation technique:: VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) at 6th hours.

Time Frame: 6th hours.

Based on the VAS (Visual Analogue Scale), the pain levels of the patients were assessed. The scale consisted of a 100-mm-long line divided into 10 equal intervals from 0 (no pain) to 100 (very severe pain). Every patient was asked to mark his or her perceived postoperative pain level on the line.

Pain level comparison after root canal obturation with three different obturation technique.: VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) at 12th hours.

Time Frame: 12th hours.

ased on the VAS (Visual Analogue Scale), the pain levels of the patients were assessed. The scale consisted of a 100-mm-long line divided into 10 equal intervals from 0 (no pain) to 100 (very severe pain). Every patient was asked to mark his or her perceived postoperative pain level on the line.

Pain level comparison after root canal obturation with three different obturation technique.: VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) at 24th hours

Time Frame: 24th hours.

Based on the VAS (Visual Analogue Scale), the pain levels of the patients were assessed. The scale consisted of a 100-mm-long line divided into 10 equal intervals from 0 (no pain) to 100 (very severe pain). Every patient was asked to mark his or her perceived postoperative pain level on the line.

Pain level comparison after root canal obturation with three different obturation technique.: VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) at 2nd days.

Time Frame: 2nd days

Based on the VAS (Visual Analogue Scale), the pain levels of the patients were assessed. The scale consisted of a 100-mm-long line divided into 10 equal intervals from 0 (no pain) to 100 (very severe pain). Every patient was asked to mark his or her perceived postoperative pain level on the line.

Pain level comparison after root canal obturation with three different obturation technique.: VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) at 3th days.

Time Frame: 3th days

Based on the VAS (Visual Analogue Scale), the pain levels of the patients were assessed. The scale consisted of a 100-mm-long line divided into 10 equal intervals from 0 (no pain) to 100 (very severe pain). Every patient was asked to mark his or her perceived postoperative pain level on the line.

Pain level comparison after root canal obturation with three different obturation technique.: VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) at 4th days.

Time Frame: 4th days.

Based on the VAS (Visual Analogue Scale), the pain levels of the patients were assessed. The scale consisted of a 100-mm-long line divided into 10 equal intervals from 0 (no pain) to 100 (very severe pain). Every patient was asked to mark his or her perceived postoperative pain level on the line.

Pain level comparison after root canal obturation with three different obturation technique.: VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) at 5th days.

Time Frame: 5th days

Based on the VAS (Visual Analogue Scale), the pain levels of the patients were assessed. The scale consisted of a 100-mm-long line divided into 10 equal intervals from 0 (no pain) to 100 (very severe pain). Every patient was asked to mark his or her perceived postoperative pain level on the line.

Pain level comparison after root canal obturation with three different obturation technique.: VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) at 6th days.

Time Frame: 6th days

Based on the VAS (Visual Analogue Scale), the pain levels of the patients were assessed. The scale consisted of a 100-mm-long line divided into 10 equal intervals from 0 (no pain) to 100 (very severe pain). Every patient was asked to mark his or her perceived postoperative pain level on the line.

Pain level comparison after root canal obturation with three different obturation technique.: VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) at 7th days.

Time Frame: 7th days

Based on the VAS (Visual Analogue Scale), the pain levels of the patients were assessed. The scale consisted of a 100-mm-long line divided into 10 equal intervals from 0 (no pain) to 100 (very severe pain). Every patient was asked to mark his or her perceived postoperative pain level on the line.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Analgesic intake comparison after root canal obturation with three different obturation technique at 6th hours(6th hours.)
  • Analgesic intake comparison after root canal obturation with three different obturation technique at 12th hours(12th hours)
  • Analgesic intake comparison after root canal obturation with three different obturation technique at 24th hours(24th hours.)
  • Analgesic intake comparison after root canal obturation with three different obturation technique at 2nd days(2nd days)
  • Analgesic intake comparison after root canal obturation with three different obturation technique at 3th days(3th days)
  • Analgesic intake comparison after root canal obturation with three different obturation technique at 4th days(4 th days)
  • Analgesic intake comparison after root canal obturation with three different obturation technique at 5th days(5th days)
  • Analgesic intake comparison after root canal obturation with three different obturation technique at 6th days(6th days)
  • Analgesic intake comparison after root canal obturation with three different obturation technique at 7th days(7th days.)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials