Impact of a Technology Mediated Dance Intervention
- Conditions
- Older Adults Without Any Specific Clinical Condition
- Interventions
- Other: Dance mediated by tecnhology
- Registration Number
- NCT05460039
- Lead Sponsor
- Aveiro University
- Brief Summary
This study aims to investigate whether a technology-mediated dance impacts on psychosocial, physical and cognitive functions of the old adults when compared to usual activities.
- Detailed Description
This study aims to investigate whether a technology-mediated dance impacts on psychosocial, physical, and cognitive functions of old adults when compared to usual activities. It will have two arms one of which will receive a dance mat and perform dance sessions for 8 weeks, while the other group will continue their usual activities. Participants will be assessed for psychosocial, physical, and cognitive aspects at baseline, end of the intervention, and at 3 months follow-up.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 70
- People living independently in the community
- 65 years old or older
- With no cognitive impairment defined based on the 6-item cognitive decline test [4]
- Independent at walking without walking aids
- Access to a personal computer and internet
- For older adults unable to use a computer, a patient or carer with digital literacy needs to be identified for the older adult to enter the study.
- Reporting cardiovascular pathology that limits the performance of the dance or dizziness or imbalance prior to using the mat
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description DanceMove Dance mediated by tecnhology This group will perform dance sessions mediated by technology (a dance mat and a web platform).
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Gait velocity At 3 months follow up Assessed using the gait velocity test, i.e., the velocity of gait when walking in a straight line for 4 meters; it is measured in meters per second.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Balance At 3 months follow up Balance will be assessed through the Functional Reach Test, which measures the ability of a person to reach forward without moving the feet; it is measured in cm.
Cognitive functioning At 3 months follow up This will be measured using the Trail Making Test which is a paper-based test; score is given in seconds.
Pain intensity At 3 months follow up Measured with a 100 mm Vertical Numeric Pain Rating Scale, anchored with 0 (no pain) and 100 (worst possible pain)
Quality of life At 3 months follow up Measured using the WHOQOL-Bref (WHO Quality of Life questionnaire); scores range between 0 to 20 and higher scores indicate better quality of life
Loneliness At 3 months follow up Measured using the University of California, Los Angeles, Loneliness Scale; scores vary between 4 and 28 and higher scores indicate higher loneliness
Health status At 3 months follow up Measured using the EuroQoL EQ-5D; scores range from 5 to 25 and higher scores; indicate lower quality of life (note: according to the EuroQol Research Foundation, EQ-5D is not an abbreviation and is the correct term to use in print or verbally)
Self-efficacy At 3 months follow up Measured using the Perceived Self-Efficacy Scale; scores vary between 10 and 40 and higher scores indicate higher self-efficacy
Social support At 3 months follow up Measured with the Oslo Social Support Scale (OSSS-3) with Life Events Scale; score varies between 3 and 14 and higher scores indicate stronger social support
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
School of Health Sciences
🇵🇹Aveiro, Portugal